BioInfoBank Library


 

Muhammed, M (Maged)

Latest papers:

go to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Division of Infectious Diseases; Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston, MA USA.
Mouse models have facilitated the study of fungal pneumonia. In this report, we present the working protocols of groups that are working on the following pathogens: Aspergillus, Coccidioides, Cryptococcus, Fusarium, Histoplasma and Rhizopus. We describe the experimental procedures and the detailed methods that have been followed in the experienced laboratories to study pulmonary fungal infection; we also discuss the anticipated results and technical notes, and provide the practical advices that will help the users of these models.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Recent work suggests that fungal virulence factors important in human disease have evolved through interactions with environmental predators such as amoebae, nematodes, and insects. This has allowed the use of simple model hosts for the study of fungal pathogenesis; specifically, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has become a model host to study medically important fungi. Alternative model hosts can be used as easy tools to identify virulence factors of pathogens, to study evolutionarily preserved immune responses, and to identify novel antifungal compounds with low cost. This chapter describes assays utilizing the nematode in studies on fungal-host interactions and antifungal drug discovery. These assays include the nematode killing assay, the progeny permissive assay, and antifungal compound discovery assay.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases , Boston, MA , USA.
Fusariosis is an emerging infectious complication of immune deficiency, but models to study this infection are lacking. The use of the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a model host to study the pathogenesis of Fusarium spp. was investigated. We observed that Fusarium conidia consumed by C. elegans can cause a lethal infection and result in more than 90% killing of the host within 120 hours, and the nematode had a significantly longer survival when challenged with Fusarium proliferatum compared to other species. Interestingly, mycelium production appears to be a major contributor in nematode killing in this model system, and C. elegans mutant strains with the immune response genes, tir-1 (encoding a protein containing a TIR domain that functions upstream of PMK-1) and pmk-1 (the homolog of the mammalian p38 MAPK) lived significantly shorter when challenged with Fusarium compared to the wild type strain. Furthermore, we used the C. elegans model to assess the efficacy and toxicity of various compounds against Fusarium. We demonstrated that amphotericin B, voriconazole, mancozeb, and phenyl mercury acetate significantly prolonged the survival of Fusarium-infected C. elegans, although mancozeb was toxic at higher concentrations. In conclusion, we describe a new model system for the study of Fusarium pathogenesis and evolutionarily preserved host responses to this important fungal pathogen.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
The use of invertebrate model hosts has increased in popularity due to numerous advantages of invertebrates over mammalian models, including ethical, logistical and budgetary features. This review provides an introduction to three model hosts, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and the larvae of Galleria mellonella, the greater wax moth. It highlights principal experimental advantages of each model, for C. elegans the ability to run high-throughput assays, for D. melanogaster the evolutionarily conserved innate immune response, and for G. mellonella the ability to conduct experiments at 37°C and easily inoculate a precise quantity of pathogen. It additionally discusses recent research that has been conducted with each host to identify pathogen virulence factors, study the immune response, and evaluate potential antimicrobial compounds, focusing principally on fungal pathogens.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, 55 Fruit St., Gray-Jackson Rm 504, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Members of the fungal genus Fusarium are capable of manifesting in a multitude of clinical infections, most commonly in immunocompromised patients. In order to better understand the interaction between the fungus and host, we have developed the larvae of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, as a heterologous host for fusaria. When conidia are injected into the haemocoel of this Lepidopteran system, both clinical and environmental isolates of the fungus are able to kill the larvae at 37 °C, although killing occurs more rapidly when incubated at 30 °C. This killing was dependent on several other factors besides temperature, including the Fusarium strain, the number of conidia injected, and the conidia morphology, where macroconidia are more virulent than their microconidia counterpart. There was a correlation in the killing rate of Fusarium spp. when evaluated in G. mellonella and a murine model. In vivo studies indicated G. mellonella haemocytes were capable of initially phagocytosing both conidial morphologies. The G. mellonella system was also used to evaluate antifungal agents, and amphotericin B was able to confer a significant increase in survival to Fusarium-infected larvae. The G. mellonella-Fusarium pathogenicity system revealed that virulence of Fusarium spp. is similar, regardless of the origin of the isolate, and that mammalian endothermy is a major deterrent for Fusarium infection and therefore provides a suitable alternative to mammalian models to investigate the interaction between the host and this increasingly important fungal pathogen.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, Eng, Francisco José Longo, São José dos Campos, Brazil. juliana@fosjc.unesp.br
BACKGROUND Candida can cause mucocutaneous and/or systemic infections in hospitalized and immunosuppressed patients. Most individuals are colonized by Candida spp. as part of the oral flora and the intestinal tract. We compared oral and systemic isolates for the capacity to form biofilm in an in vitro biofilm model and pathogenicity in the Galleria mellonella infection model. The oral Candida strains were isolated from the HIV patients and included species of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. norvegensis, and C. dubliniensis. The systemic strains were isolated from patients with invasive candidiasis and included species of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. lusitaniae, and C. kefyr. For each of the acquired strains, biofilm formation was evaluated on standardized samples of silicone pads and acrylic resin. We assessed the pathogenicity of the strains by infecting G. mellonella animals with Candida strains and observing survival. RESULTS The biofilm formation and pathogenicity in Galleria was similar between oral and systemic isolates. The quantity of biofilm formed and the virulence in G. mellonella were different for each of the species studied. On silicone pads, C. albicans and C. dubliniensis produced more biofilm (1.12 to 6.61 mg) than the other species (0.25 to 3.66 mg). However, all Candida species produced a similar biofilm on acrylic resin, material used in dental prostheses. C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis were the most virulent species in G. mellonella with 100% of mortality, followed by C. lusitaniae (87%), C. novergensis (37%), C. krusei (25%), C. glabrata (20%), and C. kefyr (12%). CONCLUSIONS We found that on silicone pads as well as in the Galleria model, biofilm formation and virulence depends on the Candida species. Importantly, for C. albicans the pathogenicity of oral Candida isolates was similar to systemic Candida isolates, suggesting that Candida isolates have similar biofilm-forming ability and virulence regardless of the infection site from which it was isolated.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
INTRODUCTION: The number of microorganism strains with resistance to known antimicrobials is increasing. Therefore, there is a high demand for new, non-toxic and efficient antimicrobial agents. Research with the microscopic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can address this high demand for the discovery of new antimicrobial compounds. In particular, C. elegans can be used as a model host for in vivo drug discovery through high-throughput screens of chemical libraries. AREAS COVERED: This review introduces the use of substitute model hosts and especially C. elegans in the study of microbial pathogenesis. The authors also highlight recently published literature on the role of C. elegans in drug discovery and outline its use as a promising host with unique advantages in the discovery of new antimicrobial drugs. EXPERT OPINION: C. elegans can be used, as a model host, to research many diseases, including fungal infections and Alzheimer's disease. In addition, high-throughput techniques, for screening chemical libraries, can also be facilitated. Nevertheless, C. elegans and mammals have significant differences that both limit the use of the nematode in research and the degree by which results can be interpreted. That being said, the use of C. elegans in drug discovery still holds promise and the field continues to grow, with attempts to improve the methodology already underway.
Virulence. ;2 (2):91-6  21304267 
go to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Fusarium is the second most frequent mold involved in fungal infections and is particularly important among immunocompromised patients. Culture methods and microscopy are still routinely used in clinical laboratories to identify Fusarium spp, and more sophisticated, timely, and effective methods for detecting Fusarium spp. in laboratory samples could improve the outcome of the patient. These investigational diagnostic approaches include serological assays and specific nested PCR assays that can yield positive and negative predictive values of over 90%. Other assays in development, such as mass spectroscopy techniques, can provide accurate and consistent results. The treatment of fusariosis in immunocompromised patients remains a challenge and the prognosis of systemic fusariosis in this population remains poor. Successful treatment is highly dependent on the particular Fusarium species involved in the infection. High dose intravenous amphotericin B formulation is recommended as the first line of therapy in management of fusariosis in patients. Voriconazole is also effective in treating fusariosis. Intolerance, contraindication, or failure of the amphotericin B formulation warrants the use of voriconazole as an alternative agent, and posaconazole is licensed as salvage therapy against invasive fusariosis. Adjunctive therapies such as surgical debridement of infected tissue, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) infusions, or granulocyte transfusions are also tools for managing fusariosis. In conclusion, Fusarium infection is considered an emerging problem and should be suspected in immunocompromised patients experiencing systemic infection and should be treated accordingly.
Polish News
2012-05-17 08:02:56 © BioInfoBank Institute