Joffe, A (Ari)
Latest papers:
Anand Kumar,
Ryan Zarychanski,
Ruxandra Pinto,
Deborah J Cook,
John Marshall,
Jacques Lacroix,
Tom Stelfox,
Sean Bagshaw,
Karen Choong,
Francois Lamontagne,
Alexis F Turgeon,
Stephen Lapinsky,
Stéphane P Ahern,
Orla Smith,
Faisal Siddiqui,
Philippe Jouvet,
Kosar Khwaja,
Lauralyn McIntyre,
Kusum Menon,
Jamie Hutchison,
David Hornstein,
Ari Joffe,
Francois Lauzier,
Jeffrey Singh,
Tim Karachi,
Kim Wiebe,
Kendiss Olafson,
Clare Ramsey,
Satendra Sharma,
Peter Dodek,
Maureen Meade,
Richard Hall,
Robert Fowler
Health Sciences Centre and St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (Drs Kumar, Siddiqui, Wiebe, Olafson, Ramsey, and Sharma); Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancercare Manitoba, Winnipeg (Dr Zarychanski); Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Pinto and Fowler); Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Cook and Meade) and Medicine (Dr Karachi), McMaster Children's Hospital (Dr Choong), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Marshall and Ms Smith); Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada (Drs Lacroix and Jouvet); Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Dr Stelfox); Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Drs Bagshaw and Joffe); Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (Dr Lamontagne); Centre de Recherche du CHA, Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (Drs Turgeon and Lauzier); Intensive Care Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital (Dr Lapinsky) and University Health Network (Dr Singh), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada (Dr Ahern); Trauma Services, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada (Dr Khwaja); Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr McIntyre); Clinical Research Unit, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa (Dr Menon); Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Hutchison); SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada (Dr Hornstein); University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Dodek); and Department of Anesthesia, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (Dr Hall).
CONTEXT: Between March and July 2009, the largest number of confirmed cases of 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection occurred in North America. OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critically ill patients in Canada with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection.Design, Setting, and PATIENTS: A prospective observational study of 168 critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in 38 adult and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) in Canada between April 16 and August 12, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were 28-day and 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included frequency and duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of ICU stay. RESULTS: Critical illness occurred in 215 patients with confirmed (n = 162), probable (n = 6), or suspected (n = 47) community-acquired 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection. Among the 168 patients with confirmed or probable 2009 influenza A(H1N1), the mean (SD) age was 32.3 (21.4) years; 113 were female (67.3%) and 50 were children (29.8%). Overall mortality among critically ill patients at 28 days was 14.3%(95% confidence interval, 9.5%-20.7%). There were 43 patients who were aboriginal Canadians (25.6%). The median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2-7 days) and from hospitalization to ICU admission was 1 day (IQR, -2 days). Shock and nonpulmonary acute organ dysfunction was common (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment mean [SD] score of 6.8 [3.6] on day 1). Neuraminidase inhibitors were administered to 152 patients (90.5%). All patients were severely hypoxemic (mean [SD] ratio of Pao(2) to fraction of inspired oxygen [Fio(2)] of 147 [128] mm Hg) at ICU admission. Mechanical ventilation was received by 136 patients (81. %). The median duration of ventilation was 12 days (IQR, 6-20 days) and ICU stay was 12 days (IQR, 5-20 days). Lung rescue therapies included neuromuscular blockade (28% of patients), inhaled nitric oxide (13.7%), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (11.9%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.2%), and prone positioning ventilation (3. %). Overall mortality among critically ill patients at 90 days was 17.3%(95% confidence interval, 12. %-24. %; n = 29). CONCLUSION: Critical illness due to 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Canada occurred rapidly after hospital admission, often in young adults, and was associated with severe hypoxemia, multisystem organ failure, a requirement for prolonged mechanical ventilation, and the frequent use of rescue therapies.Published online October 12, 2009 (doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1496).
Ariane Willems,
Karen Harrington,
Jacques Lacroix,
Dominique Biarent,
Ari Joffe,
David Wensley,
Thierry Ducruet,
Paul Hébert,
Marisa Tucci
From the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (AW, KH, JL, MT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, PQ, Canada; Departments of -----(MT) and -----(JL), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hôpital des Enfants Reine Fabiola (DB), Brussels, Belgium; Department of ------(ARJ), Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Division of Critical Care (DW), BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Research Center (TD), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada; Critical Care Unit (PCH), Hôpital Général d'Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
OBJECTIVE:: To determine the impact of a restrictive vs. a liberal transfusion strategy on new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children post cardiac surgery. The optimal transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery in children is unknown. DESIGN:: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING:: Tertiary pediatric intensive care units. PATIENTS:: Participants are a subgroup of pediatric patients post cardiac surgery from the TRIPICU (Transfusion Requirements in Pediatric Intensive Care Units) study. Exclusion criteria specific to the cardiac surgery subgroup included: age <28 days and patients remaining cyanotic. INTERVENTION:: Critically ill children with a hemoglobin </=95 g/L within 7 days of pediatric intensive care unit admission were randomized to receive prestorage leukocyte-reduced red-cell transfusion if their hemoglobin dropped either <70 g/L (restrictive) or 95 g/L (liberal). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Postoperative cardiac patients (n = 125) from seven centers were enrolled. The restrictive (n = 63) and liberal (n = 62) groups were similar at baseline in age (mean +/- standard deviation = 31.4 +/- 38.1 mos vs. 26.4 +/- 39.1 mos), surgical procedure, severity of illness (Pediatric Risk of Mortality score = 3.4 +/- 3.2 vs. 3.2 +/- 3.2), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (46% vs. 44%), mechanical ventilation (62% vs. 60%), and hemoglobin (83 vs. 80 g/L). Mean hemoglobin remained 21 g/L lower in the restrictive group after randomization. No significant difference was found in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (primary outcome) in the restrictive group vs. liberal group (12.7% vs. 6.5%; p = .36), pediatric intensive care unit length of stay (7. +/- 5. days vs. 7.4 +/- 6.4 days) or 28-day mortality (3.2% vs. 3.2%). CONCLUSION:: In this subgroup analysis of cardiac surgery patients, a restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy, as compared with a liberal one, was not associated with any significant difference in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, but this evidence is not definitive.
Most cited papers:
Stéphane Leteurtre,
Alain Martinot,
Alain Duhamel,
François Proulx,
Bruno Grandbastien,
Jacques Cotting,
Ronald Gottesman,
Ari Joffe,
Jurg Pfenninger,
Philippe Hubert,
Jacques Lacroix,
Francis Leclerc
Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK. gale.pearson@bch.nhs.uk <gale.pearson@bch.nhs.uk>
BACKGROUND: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is more frequent than death in paediatric intensive care units. Estimation of the severity of this syndrome could be a useful additional outcome measure in clinical trials in such units. We aimed to validate the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score and estimate its validity when recorded daily (dPELOD). METHODS: We did a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study in seven multidisciplinary, tertiary-care paediatric intensive care units of university-affiliated hospitals (two French, three Canadian, and two Swiss). We included 1806 consecutive patients (median age 24 months; IQR 5-90). PELOD score includes six organ dysfunctions and 12 variables and was recorded daily. For each variable, the most abnormal value each day and during the whole stay were used in calculating the dPELOD and PELOD scores, respectively. Outcome was vital status at discharge. We used Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests to evaluate calibration and areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to estimate discrimination. FINDINGS: 370 (21%) patients had no organ dysfunction, 471 (26%) had one, 457 (25%) had two, and 508 (28%) had three or more. Case fatality rate was 6.4%(115 deaths). PELOD score was significantly higher in non-survivors (mean 31. [SE 1.2]) than survivors (9.4 [ .2]; p< .0001). Calibration (p= .54) and discrimination (AUC= .91, SE= .01) of PELOD and dPELOD (p> or = .39; AUC> or = .79) scores were good. INTERPRETATION: PELOD and dPELOD scores are valid outcome measures of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in paediatric intensive care units; their use should significantly reduce the sample size required to complete clinical trials in critically ill children.
Mesh-terms: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Comparative Study; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Hospital Mortality; Human; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric :: statistics & numerical data; Logistic Models; Male; Medical Records, Problem-Oriented :: statistics & numerical data; Multiple Organ Failure :: classification; Multiple Organ Failure :: diagnosis; Multiple Organ Failure :: mortality; Outcome Assessment (Health Care):: methods; Outcome Assessment (Health Care):: statistics & numerical data; Physical Examination :: statistics & numerical data; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't;
Jacques Lacroix,
Paul C Hébert,
James S Hutchison,
Heather A Hume,
Marisa Tucci,
Thierry Ducruet,
France Gauvin,
Jean-Paul Collet,
Baruch J Toledano,
Pierre Robillard,
Ari Joffe,
Dominique Biarent,
Kathleen Meert,
Mark J Peters
Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. jacques_lacroix@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
BACKGROUND: The optimal hemoglobin threshold for erythrocyte transfusions in critically ill children is unknown. We hypothesized that a restrictive transfusion strategy of using packed red cells that were leukocyte-reduced before storage would be as safe as a liberal transfusion strategy, as judged by the outcome of multiple-organ dysfunction. METHODS: In this noninferiority trial, we enrolled 637 stable, critically ill children who had hemoglobin concentrations below 9.5 g per deciliter within 7 days after admission to an intensive care unit. We randomly assigned 320 patients to a hemoglobin threshold of 7 g per deciliter for red-cell transfusion (restrictive-strategy group) and 317 patients to a threshold of 9.5 g per deciliter (liberal-strategy group). RESULTS: Hemoglobin concentrations were maintained at a mean (+/-SD) level that was 2.1+/- .2 g per deciliter lower in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group (lowest average levels, 8.7+/- .4 and 10.8+/- .5 g per deciliter, respectively; P< .001). Patients in the restrictive-strategy group received 44% fewer transfusions; 174 patients (54%) in that group did not receive any transfusions, as compared with 7 patients (2%) in the liberal-strategy group (P< .001). New or progressive multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (the primary outcome) developed in 38 patients in the restrictive-strategy group, as compared with 39 in the liberal-strategy group (12% in both groups)(absolute risk reduction with the restrictive strategy, .4%; 95% confidence interval,-4.6 to 5.4). There were 14 deaths in each group within 28 days after randomization. No significant differences were found in other outcomes, including adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In stable, critically ill children a hemoglobin threshold of 7 g per deciliter for red-cell transfusion can decrease transfusion requirements without increasing adverse outcomes.(Controlled-trials.com number, ISRCTN37246456 [controlled-trials.com].).
Charlene Robertson,
Joe Watt,
Ari Joffe,
Deirdre Murphy,
Julianna Nagy,
Deirdre McLean,
Kerrie Pain,
L. Saunders
Departments of Pediatrics and Rehabilitation Medicine (Drs. Robertson, Watt, Murphy, Nagy, McLean, and Pain), Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and the Department of Pediatrics (Drs. Robertson, Watt, and Joffe) and Department of Public Health Sciences (Dr. Saunders), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
OBJECTIVES: Study 1: To determine the interrater agreement on the Multiattribute Health Status Classification (MAHSC) for brain-injured children. Study 2: To determine the outcome of severe childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) by comparing three measures: MAHSC, Functional Independence Measures (FIM/WeeFIM), and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Designs: Study 1: Clinic recruitment of parents of patients. Study 2: Surveillance follow-up of an inception cohort. Settings: Study 1: The Brain Injury Clinic, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Canada. Study 2: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University of Alberta Hospital. PATIENTS: Study 1: Two physiatrists and parents of 50 children (5-18 yrs, 54% boys) independently completed the survey. Study 2: From a cohort of 51 patients (3-17 yrs, 69% boys, 6 deaths) consecutively admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit in 1995 and 1996 with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Score </= 8 within the first 24 hrs postinjury), parents of all survivors (71% boys) completed outcome measures at 6-12 months postinjury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Study 1: The interrater agreement exceeded 70% for attributes of sensation, mobility, cognition, self-care, and general health. Study 2: Of 45 survivors, 34 (76%) had a "good recovery" on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, 16 (36%) had normal scores on the FIM/WeeFIM, and only 8 (18%) had normal attributes on the MAHSC. Correlations of measures were Glasgow Outcome Scale and MAHSC,-.73; Glasgow Outcome Scale and FIM/WeeFIM,.64; and MAHSC and FIM/WeeFIM,-.63. Sensitivity and specificity from acute injury predictors for the Glasgow Outcome Scale were 88% and 91%, respectively; for MAHSC 75% and 70%; and for FIM/WeeFIM 63% and 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The MAHSC has a high interrater reliability after brain injury and is a useful parent-report surveillance tool to audit outcome after severe TBI. It identified problems not addressed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale or FIM/WeeFIM. Most children with severe TBI have adverse outcomes.
Dermot R Doherty,
Christopher S Parshuram,
Isabelle Gaboury,
Aparna Hoskote,
Jacques Lacroix,
Marisa Tucci,
Ari Joffe,
Karen Choong,
Rosemarie Farrell,
Desmond J Bohn,
James S Hutchison
Department of Anaesthesia, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust and the Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom; CHU mère-enfant Sainte-Justine, Pediatric Intensive Care Division, Department of Pediatrics, Montréal, Québec, Canada; University of Alberta and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Program, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BACKGROUND: -Hypothermia therapy improves mortality and functional outcome after cardiac arrest and birth asphyxia in adults and newborns. The effect of hypothermia therapy in infants and children with cardiac arrest is unknown. Methods and Results-A 2-year, retrospective, 5-center study was conducted, and 222 patients with cardiac arrest were identified. Seventy-nine (35.6%) of these patients met eligibility criteria for the study (age >40 weeks postconception and <18 years, cardiac arrest >3 minutes in duration, survival for >/=12 hours after return of circulation, and no birth asphyxia). Twenty-nine (36.7%) of these 79 patients received hypothermia therapy and were cooled to 33.7+/-1.3 degrees C for 20.8+/-11.9 hours. Hypothermia therapy was associated with higher mortality (P= .009), greater duration of cardiac arrest (P= .005), more resuscitative interventions (P< .001), higher postresuscitation lactate levels (P< .001), and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P< .001). When adjustment was made for duration of cardiac arrest, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and propensity scores by use of a logistic regression model, no statistically significant differences in mortality were found (P= .502) between patients treated with hypothermia therapy and those treated with normothermia. Also, no differences in hypothermia-related adverse events were found between groups. Conclusions-Hypothermia therapy was used in resuscitation scenarios that are associated with greater risk of poor outcome. In an adjusted analysis, the effectiveness of hypothermia therapy was neither supported nor refuted. A randomized controlled trial is needed to rigorously evaluate the benefits and harms of hypothermia therapy after pediatric cardiac arrest.
