BioInfoBank Library


FP7 Partner
Add BioInfo.PL bioinformatics lab to Your FP7 application
username:
password:
Forgot password
Register
Login
Submit a short report and win 100 €
author name recommending commenting favorite    papers recom. cited
0 0 0 1 0 1 [Update]
0 0 0 4 0 25 [Update]
0 0 0 22 0 233 [Update]

Latest Paper:

Nature. 2009 Nov 8;: 19898493 (P,S,G,E,B,D)
[1] The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research,[2] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Direct be reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be achieved by overexpression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cells c-Myc transcription factors, but only a minority of donor somatic cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency. Here we demonstrate that pluripotent reprogramming by these transcription factors is a continuous stochastic process where almost all mouse donor cells eventually give rise to but iPS cells on continued growth and transcription factor expression. Additional inhibition of the p53/p21 pathway or overexpression of Lin28 increased Lin28 the cell division rate and resulted in an accelerated kinetics of iPS cell formation that was directly proportional to the in increase in cell proliferation. In contrast, Nanog overexpression accelerated reprogramming in a predominantly cell-division-rate-independent manner. Quantitative analyses define distinct cell-division-rate-dependent somatic and -independent modes for accelerating the stochastic course of reprogramming, and suggest that the number of cell divisions is a proliferation. key parameter driving epigenetic reprogramming to pluripotency.
Cell Stem Cell. 2009 May 6;: 19427283 (P,S,G,E,B,D)
The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Embryonic pluripotent stem cells (ESCs) are isolated from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocysts, whereas epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) are derived by from the postimplantation epiblast and display a restricted developmental potential. Here we characterize pluripotent states in the nonobese diabetic (NOD)inner mouse strain, which prior to this study was considered "nonpermissive" for ESC derivation. We find that NOD stem cells can epiblast be stabilized by providing constitutive expression of Klf4 or c-Myc or small molecules that can replace these factors during in in vitro reprogramming. The NOD ESCs and iPSCs appear to be "metastable," as they acquire an alternative EpiSC-like identity after removal ICM-like of the exogenous factors, while their reintroduction converts the cells back to ICM-like pluripotency. Our findings suggest that stem cells (ESCs) from different genetic backgrounds can assume distinct states of pluripotency in vitro, the stability of which is regulated by endogenous while genetic determinants and can be modified by exogenous factors.
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jan 18;: 19151700 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:1
[1] The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.[2] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Proviruses were carrying drug-inducible Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc used to derive 'primary' induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells were segregated through germline factors. transmission, generating mice and cells carrying subsets of the reprogramming factors. Drug treatment produced 'secondary' iPS cells only when the Sox2, missing factor was introduced. This approach creates a defined system for studying reprogramming mechanisms and allows screening of genetically homogeneous induced cells for compounds that can replace any transcription factor required for iPS cell derivation.
J Cell Physiol. 2008 Jul 17;: 18636555 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:3
Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Cell and Matrix Research Institute, Skeletal Diseases Genome Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Runx2 Tg) is a master transcription factor for chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. However expression of Runx2 (by RT-PCR), has kb been reported in non-skeletal tissues such as breast, T cells and testis. To better define Runx2 activity in non-skeletal tissues,formation. we examined transgenic (Tg) mice expressing LacZ gene under control of 3. kb (3 kb Tg) or 1. kb (1 tissues, kb Tg) of the Runx2 distal (P1) promoter, Runx2 LacZ knock-in (Runx2(+/LacZ)) and Runx2/P1 LacZ knock-in (Runx2/P1(+/LacZ)). In the Runx2 was 3 kb Tg mouse, beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) expression appeared in various non-skeletal tissues including testis, skin, adrenal gland and brain. beta-gal Runx2 expression from both 3 kb and 1 kb Tg, reflecting activity of the Runx2 promoter, was readily detectable in seminiferous factor tubules of the testis and the epididymis. At the single cell level, beta-gal was detected in spermatids and mature sperms analysis. not in sertoli or Leydig cells. We also detected a positive signal from the Runx2(+/LacZ) and Runx2/P1(+/LacZ) mice. Indeed, Runx2 transgenic expression was observed in isolated mature sperms, which was confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Runx2, however, was not distal related to sex determination and sperm motility. Runx2 mediated beta-gal activity is also found robustly in the hippocampus and frontal that lobe of the brain in Runx2(+/LacZ). Collectively, these results indicate that Runx2 is expressed in several non-skeletal tissues particularly sperms hippocampus of testis and hippocampus of brain. It suggests that Runx2 may play an important role in male reproductive organ testis and and brain. J. Cell. Physiol.(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jul 1;: 18594521 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:28
[1] Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.[2] These authors contributed equally to this work.
The defined study of induced pluripotency is complicated by the need for infection with high-titer retroviral vectors, which results in genetically heterogeneous chimeras cell populations. We generated genetically homogeneous 'secondary' somatic cells that carry the reprogramming factors as defined doxycycline (dox)-inducible transgenes. These the cells were produced by infecting fibroblasts with dox-inducible lentiviruses, reprogramming by dox addition, selecting induced pluripotent stem cells and producing homogeneous chimeric mice. Cells derived from these chimeras reprogram upon dox exposure without the need for viral infection with efficiencies 25-those to 50-fold greater than those observed using direct infection and drug selection for pluripotency marker reactivation. We demonstrate that (i)with various induction levels of the reprogramming factors can induce pluripotency,(ii) the duration of transgene activity directly correlates with reprogramming induced efficiency,(iii) cells from many somatic tissues can be reprogrammed and (iv) different cell types require different induction levels. This the system facilitates the characterization of reprogramming and provides a tool for genetic or chemical screens to enhance reprogramming.
Cell. 2008 Apr 18;133 (2):250-64 18423197 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:85
The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Pluripotent expression cells can be derived from fibroblasts by ectopic expression of defined transcription factors. A fundamental unresolved question is whether terminally reprogramming differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency. We utilized transgenic and inducible expression of four transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4,ectopic and c-Myc) to reprogram mouse B lymphocytes. These factors were sufficient to convert nonterminally differentiated B cells to a pluripotent be state. However, reprogramming of mature B cells required additional interruption with the transcriptional state maintaining B cell identity by either either ectopic expression of the myeloid transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding-protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha) or specific knockdown of the B cell transcription factor Pax5. Multiple B iPS lines were clonally derived from both nonfully and fully differentiated B lymphocytes, which gave rise to adult chimeras with be germline contribution, and to late-term embryos when injected into tetraploid blastocysts. Our study provides definite proof for the direct nuclear derived reprogramming of terminally differentiated adult cells to pluripotency.
Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Feb 7;2 (2):151-9 18371436 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:65
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Pluripotency doxycycline can be induced in differentiated murine and human cells by retroviral transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc. We have normal devised a reprogramming strategy in which these four transcription factors are expressed from doxycycline (dox)-inducible lentiviral vectors. Using these inducible human constructs, we derived induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and found that transgene silencing is a strategy prerequisite for normal cell differentiation. We have analyzed the timing of known pluripotency marker activation during mouse iPS cell derivation and and observed that alkaline phosphatase (AP) was activated first, followed by stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 (SSEA1). Expression of Nanog and in the endogenous Oct4 gene, marking fully reprogrammed cells, was only observed late in the process. Importantly, the virally transduced cDNAs induced needed to be expressed for at least 12 days in order to generate iPS cells. Our results are a step fully toward understanding some of the molecular events governing epigenetic reprogramming.
Cell Cycle. 2008 Jan 14;7 (6): 18239456 (P,S,G,E,B) Cited:3
The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Since Oct4 its discovery as a critical regulator of pluripotency in embryonic stem (ES) cells and the inner cells mass of the these developing blastocyst, the Pou domaincontaining transcription factor Oct4 has become a proxy for "stemness" in numerous studies of somatic stem regulator cells as it's presence is often taken as evidence of pluripotency in these cells. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that the not only is Oct4 dispensable for maintaining potency in somatic stem cell compartments, but also that the methods applied to maintaining detect Oct4 and the interpretation of the resulting data may be flawed. Here we contrast pathways known to govern pluripotency contrast in embryonic stem cells with those in adult stem cells and critically discuss the concept of pluripotency in adult stem discovery cells of the mammalian soma.
Cell Stem Cell. 2007 Oct 11;1 (4):403-415 18159219 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:19
The Oct4 Pou domain containing transcription factor Oct4 is a well-established regulator of pluripotency in the inner cell mass of the mammalian it blastocyst as well as in embryonic stem cells. While it has been shown that the Oct4 gene is inactivated through a a series of epigenetic modifications following implantation, recent studies have detected Oct4 activity in a variety of somatic stem cells embryonic and tumor cells. Based on these observations it has been suggested that Oct4 may also function in maintaining self-renewal of may somatic stem cells and, in addition, may promote tumor formation. We employed a genetic approach to determine whether Oct4 is mesenchymal important for maintaining pluripotency in the stem cell compartments of several somatic tissues including the intestinal epithelium, bone marrow (hematopoietic containing and mesenchymal lineages), hair follicle, brain, and liver. Oct4 gene ablation in these tissues revealed no abnormalities in homeostasis or including regenerative capacity. We conclude that Oct4 is dispensable for both self-renewal and maintenance of somatic stem cells in the adult stem mammal.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006 Oct 19;: 17051438 (P,S,G,E,B,D) Cited:17
Department of Cell Biology and Cancer Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA, jane.lian@umassmed.edu.
We as present an overview of the concepts of tissue-specific transcriptional control mechanisms essential for development of the bone cell phenotype. BMP2 in induced transcription factors constitute a network of activities and molecular switches for bone development and osteoblast differentiation. Among these regulators essential are Runx2 (Cbfa1/AML3), the principal osteogenic master gene for bone formation, as well as homeodomain proteins and osterix. Runx2 has these multiple regulatory activities, including activation or repression of gene expression, and integration of biological signals from developmental cues, such as activities BMP/TGFbeta, Wnt and Src signaling pathways. Runx2 provides a new paradigm for transcriptional control by functioning as a principal scaffolding has protein in nuclear microenvironments to control gene expression in response to physiologic signals (growth factors, cytokines and hormones). The protein of serves as a hub for the coordination of activities essential for the expansion and differentiation of osteogenic lineage cells through of the formation of co-regulatory protein complexes organized in subnuclear domains. Mechanisms by which Runx2 supports commitment to osteogenesis and determines are cell fate involve its retention on mitotic chromosomes. Disruption of a unique protein module, the subnuclear targeting signal of Runx2,including has profound effects on osteoblast differentiation and metastasis of cancer cells in the bone microenvironment. Runx2 target genes include regulators growth of cell growth control, components of the bone extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and signaling proteins for development of the osteoblast phenotype for and bone turnover. The specificity of Runx2 regulatory activities provides a basis for novel therapeutic strategies to correct bone disorders.signal
Science news