BACKGROUND: Injury to the cervical spine (CS) is common after major trauma. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma first published its Practice Management Guidelines for the evaluation of CS injury in 1998. A subsequent revision was published in 2000. Since that time a large volume of literature has been published. As a result, the Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to develop updated guidelines for the identification of CS injury. METHODS: A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search retrieved English language articles regarding the identification of CS injury from 1998 to 2007. The questions posed were: who needs CS imaging; what imaging should be obtained; when should computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or flexion/extension radiographs be used; and how is significant ligamentous injury excluded in the comatose patient? RESULTS: Seventy-eight articles were identified. From this group, 52 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. CONCLUSION: There have been significant changes in practice since the previous CS injury guidelines. Most significantly, computed tomography has supplanted plain radiography as the primary screening modality in those who require imaging. Clinical clearance remains the standard in awake, alert patients with trauma without neurologic deficit or distracting injury who have no neck pain or tenderness with full range of motion. Cervical collars should be removed as soon as feasible. Controversy persists regarding CS clearance in the obtunded patient without gross neurologic deficit.

Background: Splenic artery embolization (SAE) improves non-operative splenic salvage rates in adults, but its utility and safety in the pediatric population is less well defined. Objective: Because adolescent trauma patients are often triaged to adult trauma centers, we were interested in evaluating SAE in this particular population. We hypothesize that angiography and embolization is a safe and effective adjunct to non-operative management in the adolescent population. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients aged 13-17 years admitted to our Level I Trauma Center with blunt splenic injury from 1997-2005 was performed. We reviewed patient demographics, operative reports, admission, and follow-up abdominal computed tomography (ACT) results, angiographic reports, and patient outcomes. Results: A total of 97 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients underwent immediate surgery, and 79 of the remaining patients had planned non-operative management. Of those participating in non-operative management, 35/79 (44%) were initially observed and 44/79 (56%) underwent initial angiography, 23/44 having embolization. Patients in the embolization group had an overall high grade of injury (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma mean grade 3.3, SD 0.6). The overall splenic salvage rate was 96%(76/79) in the non-operative management group; 100% splenic salvage was seen in the observational group; 100% salvage was also seen in patients with negative angiography, and 87% salvage (20/23) in the splenic artery embolization group. Conclusion: Splenic artery embolization may be a valuable adjunct in adolescent blunt splenic injury, especially in higher grade injuries or with evidence of splenic vascular injury on ACT.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if anemia in isolated head trauma patients results in a higher mortality rate that would justify a more liberal use of blood transfusions. METHODS: A retrospective review of isolated blunt head trauma patients was performed between January 2001 and December 2006. Comparisons were made between survivors and nonsurvivors regarding demographics, laboratory values, transfusions received, and lengths of stay. RESULTS: There were 788 patients with 735 survivors who were significantly younger (46.3 y +/- 21.5 survivors versus 68.9 y +/- 18.8 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001) and less injured [(ISS: 14.7 +/- 5.2 survivors versus 23.2 +/- 4.7 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001),(head abbreviated injury severity: 3.7 +/- 0.7 survivors versus 4.7 +/- 0.5 nonsurvivors, P < 0.0001)] than those who died (n = 53). The survivors also had shorter lengths of stay (days)[(ICU: 2.4 +/- 4.2 versus 5.6 +/- 11.7, P = 0.03),(hospital: 6.3 +/- 9.8 versus 7.8 +/- 14.8, P = 0.02)]. Multivariate logistic regression showed age (OR 1.063, CI 1.042-1.084), ISS (OR 1.376, CI 1.270-1.491), minimum hemoglobin (OR 0.855, CI 0.732-1.000), and total blood products transfused (OR 1.073, CI 1.008-1.142) to be independent predictors of mortality with an ROC of 0.942. Outcome was independent of the operative procedures, hematocrit and packed red blood cells transfused at 24, 48, and 72 h. Hemoglobin levels of <8 mg/dL were more predictive of death than >8 mg/dL (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the need to balance mild anemia with judicious blood product use in the head trauma patient. Given the risk with blood product use, each transfusion should be carefully considered and the patient re-evaluated regularly to determine the need for further intervention.

True aneurysms of aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass grafts are a relatively rare complication of bypass surgery, but because the complications of thrombosis, embolization, or rupture are potentially fatal, this condition requires immediate surgical intervention. We describe a 78-year-old man who had undergone coronary bypass 15 years previously and who presented with a saphenous vein graft that was severely degenerated and aneurysmally enlarged throughout its course, measuring as much as 5 to 6 cm in certain locations. Redo coronary artery bypass grafting using the right and left internal thoracic arteries and resection of the aneurysm were performed. We also present a review of the literature regarding diagnosis, management, and treatment of this condition.