P:URPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a hydrodynamic thrombectomy system in a prospective, multicenter randomized comparison with pulse-spray thrombolysis in hemodialysis grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine centers enrolled 120 adult patients with recently (</=14 days) thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Graft venography was used to confirm occlusion in 62 patients randomly assigned to thrombectomy and 58 to thrombolysis. For thrombolysis, a mixture of 5,000 U of heparin and 250,000 U of urokinase was distributed throughout the thrombus, first to the venous then to the arterial graft end. For thrombectomy, the catheter was passed in the same sequence. Technical success was removal of 80% or more of thrombus. Clinical success was technical success plus the ability to dialyze. Also assessed were total procedure time, thrombus treatment time, procedure-related blood loss, other complications, and 30- and 90-day outcomes. RESULTS: Patient demographics were comparable. Technical success rates were 95%(59 of 62) for thrombectomy and 90%(52 of 58) for thrombolysis (P:=.31). Clinical success rates were 89%(55 of 62) and 81%(47 of 58), respectively (P:=.24). At 30 days, 69%(43 of 62) and 66%(38 of 58), respectively, could be dialyzed through the graft (P:=.70); at 90 days, the rates were 40%(25 of 62) and 41%(24 of 58), respectively (P:=.91). None of these differences or those for procedure-related blood loss and early and late complications were statistically significant. Thrombus treatment times of 16.8 minutes for thrombectomy and 23.4 minutes for thrombolysis were significantly different (P:<.01). CONCLUSION: The hydrodynamic thrombectomy system is at least as efficacious and safe as pulse-spray thrombolysis but shortens thrombus treatment time.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheter placement with gastropexy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts from 643 patients referred for fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy during a 9 1/2-year period. In 615 patients, placement was attempted with use of three T-fastener gastropexy devices followed by percutaneous gastric puncture. Placement of a 14-F gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy catheter was then accomplished with the Seldinger technique. RESULTS: A catheter could not be placed in 28 patients (4.4%) owing to overlying viscera or prior gastric surgery. In the remaining patients, 701 procedures, including revisions, were performed, including 643 gastrojejunostomies (92%) and 58 gastrostomies (8.3%). The success rate for catheter placement was 100%. Revision was necessary in 83 instances in 64 patients (13.5%). Forty-six (55%) of these were attributed to tube dislodgment, but only two repeat gastric punctures were necessary secondary to tract disruption. There were three major complications (0.5%) and 29 minor complications (5.3%). No complications were attributed directly to gastropexy. Thirty-day follow-up data were available for 393 patients (64%), and 14-day follow-up data were available for 550 (89%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8%(23 of 393 patients); none of the deaths were related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically directed percutaneous placement of gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheters with routine gastropexy is a safe procedure. Catheter revision was necessary in 13% of patients and was usually secondary to tube dislodgment, with tract disruption an unusual complication.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has been established as a faster and safer procedure than open surgical gastrostomy. It cannot be done, however, for many patients with partially obstructing pharyngeal or esophageal carcinoma, previous gastrectomy, upper abdominal surgery, or bowel distension from distal obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We attempted percutaneous radiologic-assisted gastrostomy (RAG) in 231 patients referred for gastrostomy, 38 of whom had a relative contraindication for PEG. The procedure involves passing, under radiologic guidance, an orogastric inflation tube that contains a snare. We used a 5-inch long, 18-gauge needle to transabdominally insert a wire into the stomach, avoiding loops of bowel visualized by air contrast. Retrieving the transabdominal wire by snare allowed retrograde passage of the gastrostomy tube as done in standard PEG. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 230 of 231 cases, including 37 of the 38 patients with contraindications. We could not gain gastric access in 1 patient with a 75% gastrectomy. Overall, 6 patients developed complications and 1 died. There was no procedure-related morbidity or mortality in the patients with contraindications to PEG who underwent successful RAG. Subsequent laparotomy indicated tube passage through the liver in 2 of these cases and small bowel mesentery in 1 case without clinical problems. We performed a percutaneous jejunostomy in the efferent limb of the gastrojejunostomy in 1 patient with a previous gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: The snare technique is simpler and faster than the usual radiologic gastropexy technique, and safer than an endoscopic procedure. It has become our procedure of choice for gaining gastric access.

When anticoagulant treatment of pulmonary embolism is contraindicated or fails, interruption of blood flow through the inferior vena cava offers an alternative method for preventing further embolic episodes. In the past this required abdominal surgery, but currently several clot-capturing devices have been designed for insertion into the human inferior vena cava indirectly via a jugular or femoral venotomy. Another device is being developed for percutaneous delivery through a standard angiographic catheter. In addition to variations in the delivery methods, the form, mechanical effectiveness, and complications of these differ markedly. A suction-cup device is also available for the transvenous removal of pulmonary emboli.

Retained stones may be found in patients who have undergone operations for multiple renal calculi. These stones often produce morbidity and must be removed. The authors describe a technique using a nephrostomy tube, placed during the initial operation, to extract stones percutaneously.

An inferior vena cava filter made from nitinol, a thermal shape memory alloy, was evaluated. A series of in vitro experiments was designed to assess its shape recovery, orientation, and positioning after delivery and its embolus-capturing efficiency. For comparison, the Mobin-Uddin and Kimray-Greenfield filters were also tested. The results indicate that the nitinol filter is easily and accurately delivered and is superior to the other filters in its ability to capture emboli. In addition, it showed no tendency to migrate or to elevate the upstream hydrostatic pressures significantly.