Purpose: Fistulae between an arteriovenous hemodialysis graft (AVG) or fistula (AVF) and an adjacent vein are an unusual complication of hemodialysis access. Such fistulae may theoretically cause steal syndrome, extremity edema, or access dysfunction. We sought to use our experience and existing literature to develop a management algorithm for this access complication. Methods: Twelve patients with AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae found on fistulography were identified using a quality assurance database. Indications for fistulography, treatment rendered for both the fistulae and access stenosis, and outcome of treatment were determined. AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae, when identified and considered to be significant, were treated with embolization. Results: Five out of twelve patients had successful embolization of their AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae. Reasons for treatment included partial thrombosis of the access to the level of the fistula (n=1), contribution to bleeding during dialysis (n=1), and concern for competing flow causing thrombosis (n=5). No recurrence was identified. Seven patients did not undergo embolization either because of failure to recognize the fistula (n=3) or determination that treatment was not indicated (n=4). Two untreated fistulae were found occluded at follow-up. Additional access treatment included angioplasty (n=11), covered stent (n=1), and mechanical thrombectomy (n=3). Conclusions: The significance of AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae remains unclear; some resolve spontaneously, possibly related to PTA of outflow stenosis. Embolotherapy is an effective treatment for such fistulae when determined to be significant.

PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility and outcomes of removing retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that have fractured. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of IVC filter retrievals over an 8-year period identified patients in whom there was an attempt to retrieve fractured filters and struts. Patient medical records were evaluated for filter type, recovery method for filter body and struts, removal attempt results, and complications. RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2010, 148 IVC filters were retrieved, 15 of which were fractured. All 15 fractured filter bodies were successfully retrieved. Nine of 15 fractured filters (60%) were removed in their entirety by using endobronchial forceps to retrieve the filter body and/or fractured struts. In three cases, forceps were used to retrieve the filter body and the fractured strut was removed with a snare. In six patients (40%), only the filter body could be removed, three with the Recovery Cone and three with endobronchial forceps. Failed attempts to remove fractured struts were made in three cases, with no attempt made in the remaining three. These struts were incorporated in the right ventricle, embedded in the IVC wall, or extraluminal. Minor caval defect was identified in five of 15 retrievals (33%); mild hemoptysis was noted in one case in which the strut was snared from a pulmonary artery. No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Fractured IVC filter bodies can be safely removed. Fractured filter struts can be removed when accessible, but are often in a position that makes retrieval not possible.

PURPOSE To evaluate retrospectively the sequelae of fibroid expulsion (FE) after uterine artery embolization (UAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS From a population of 759 UAE procedures performed from July 1999 to June 2009, 37 patients were found to have a uterine fibroid communicating with the endometrial cavity resulting in "bulk" FE with the passage of large fragments or an entire tumor or "sloughing" FE with shedding or "melting" of the tumor. Medical records and magnetic resonance images were evaluated for clinical information and tumor characteristics, respectively. RESULTS The mean age of patients with FE was 43 years ± 5 (SD), with 12 nulliparous and 25 parous. Expulsion took place a mean of 14.8 weeks ± 17.7 after UAE (range, 1.6-105.9 wk). FE was asymptomatic in 5% of cases (n = 2) and symptomatic in 95%(n = 35). Among symptomatic cases, 89%(n = 31) had bulk expulsion and 11%(n = 4) had sloughing expulsion. Forty-nine percent of patients (n = 18) had tumor expulsion at home or had an office/emergency room transvaginal myomectomy (TVM), 27%(n = 10) underwent operative TVM, and 8%(n = 3) had hysteroscopic resection. Urgent and elective hysterectomies were performed in 11%(n = 4) and 5% of cases (n = 2), respectively. Nulliparous women showed a trend toward undergoing hysterectomy compared with parous women (33% vs 8%; P =.07, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS Most women tolerate FE well, with approximately half needing no operative intervention, but some may need to undergo hysteroscopy, operative TVM, or even hysterectomy. Nulliparous women are potentially at greater risk to require hysterectomy.

PURPOSE To compare the safety and effectiveness of over-the-wire catheter exchange (catheter-exchange) with catheter removal and replacement (removal-replacement) at a new site for infected or malfunctioning tunneled infusion catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a quality assurance database, 61 patients with tunneled infusion catheters placed during the period July 2001 to June 2009 were included in this study. Patients receiving hemodialysis catheters were excluded. Catheter-exchange was performed in 25 patients, and same-day removal-replacement was performed in 36 patients. Data collected included demographic information, indication for initial catheter placement and replacement, dwell time for the new catheter, and ultimate fate of the new device. Statistical comparisons between the two cohorts were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier technique and Fisher exact test. RESULTS Catheters exchanged over the wire remained functional without infection for a median of 102 days (range, 2-570 days), whereas catheters removed and replaced were functional for a median 238 days (range, 1-292 days, P =.12). After catheter replacement, there were 11 instances of subsequent infection in the catheter-exchange group and 7 instances in the removal-replacement cohort, accounting for infection rates of 4.4 and 2.3 per 1,000 catheter days (P =.049). Patients in the catheter-exchange group had 3.2 greater odds of infection compared with patients in the removal-replacement group. Five malfunction events occurred in each group, accounting for 2.0 and 1.7 malfunctions per 1,000 catheter days in the catheter-exchange and removal-replacement groups (P =.73). CONCLUSIONS Catheter-exchange of tunneled infusion catheters results in a higher infection rate compared with removal-replacement at a new site. The rate of catheter malfunction is not significantly different between the two groups. Catheter-exchange is an alternative for patients with tunneled infusion catheters who have limited venous access, but this technique should not be expanded for use in all patients. Because of the size of this initial study, further investigation is needed to verify the results in a larger sample size.

PURPOSE To examine the overall durability and breakage rates of dual-lumen silicone catheters in comparison with power-injectable dual-lumen polyurethane catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who received a 10-F dual-lumen silicone catheter or 9.5-F dual-lumen polyurethane catheter between January 2002 and July 2009 were identified through a quality assurance database. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 117 silicone and 94 polyurethane catheters were identified in 192 patients. Reasons for catheter placement and removal were recorded, as were cases of breakage and repairs. Catheter durability was compared; survival analysis was also performed. RESULTS Breakage occurred in nine of 117 silicone catheters (8%) and none of 94 polyurethane catheters (P =.005). Most catheters were placed for malignancy (162 of 211; 77%); nonmalignant indications such as total parenteral nutrition accounted for 49 out of 211 catheters (23%). The mean silicone catheter dwell time was 99 days (11,612 total catheter-days), and the mean polyurethane catheter dwell time was 78 days (7,362 total catheter-days). There was no significant difference in overall duration of function (ie, survival) between silicone and polyurethane catheters (P =.12). The infection rates were 3.6 per 1,000 catheter-days for silicone catheters and 3.5 per 1,000 catheter-days for polyurethane catheters (P value not significant). CONCLUSIONS There were fewer catheter fractures with the polyurethane catheter compared with the silicone catheter, although there was no difference in the total access site service interval for the two catheter types.

HASH(0x241de720)

A 46-year-old Cambodian woman with a history of adenomyosis underwent a uterine artery embolization procedure to control her menorrhagia. Aortography revealed a left ovarian artery originating from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) supplying a large portion of uterine vascularity. Based on recognition of this variant, the ovarian artery was embolized without compromising flow to the IMA to achieve the best chance for success.

PURPOSE: Synthetic mesh has revolutionized abdominal wall hernia repair. However, mesh infections present a clinical problem because the standard practice of surgical excision is fraught with increased morbidity. Here, single-institutional outcomes in managing mesh-related collections via percutaneous drainage are retrospectively reviewed to assess its effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients underwent drainage of perimesh collections. Three types of mesh were employed: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE; n = 5), polypropylene (n = 14), and porcine dermal collagen (n = 3). One patient received both polypropylene and PTFE. Drainage was performed with ultrasound guidance (n = 19) or surgical drain exchange (n = 2). Mesh type, culture results, fluid collection size, and location were analyzed with respect to need for mesh excision. RESULTS: Sixteen of 21 patients (76%) were successfully treated with drainage. One required additional surgical capsulectomy; the mesh was salvaged. Four required mesh excision because of recurrent infection (n = 2) or lack of improvement of clinical course (n = 2). Recurrent infection occurred in six patients, with mesh salvage via conservative management or new drainage in four. Fluid cultures were positive in 68% of patients (n = 13), with Staphylococcus aureus the most common organism. Cultures did not predict mesh excision (P =.26). The PTFE excision rate trended higher compared with polypropylene (40% vs 14%; P =.27). No porcine dermal collagen mesh was excised. Neither fluid collection size nor location predicted mesh excision. Mean follow-up was 319 days (range, 6-1,406 d). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage of suspected mesh-related abscess is effective. The use of PTFE mesh trended toward a higher excision rate.

PURPOSE: To determine if a polyester cuff offered benefit in jugular small-bore central catheters (SBCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-F single- or 6-F dual-lumen SBCC with (n = 42) or without (n = 42) a polyester cuff. Follow-up was performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months or at catheter removal, whichever came first. At scheduled follow-up, catheter function, patient satisfaction, and infection were determined. At catheter removal, tip culture was performed to determine colonization and jugular vein patency was determined with ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: The overall infection rate was 0.4 per 1,000 catheter days. There was one clinical infection (noncuffed catheter). Colonization occurred in two noncuffed catheters and one cuffed catheter. There was one catheter dislodgment in the noncuffed group and none in the cuffed group. Cuffed catheters were no more difficult to insert but took slightly longer to remove (6 minutes +/- 4.7 vs 5 minutes +/- 3, P =.39) and often required local anesthesia for removal, whereas noncuffed catheters did not (41% vs 0%, P =.001). Partial (two cuffed, 0 noncuffed) or complete (two cuffed, one noncuffed) jugular thrombosis was seen on five of 58 completion US studies (8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A polyester cuff on a SBCC confers no significant benefit in short-term colonization rates. Infection in SBCCs is uncommon. Despite their small diameters, SBCCs can result in jugular thrombosis, an important consideration in any patient requiring long-term venous access.

PURPOSE: Nontunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTDCs) are widely used for initial hemodialysis access in new-onset renal failure. The National Kidney Foundation recommends NTDC use for hemodialysis duration of less than 1 week in acute kidney injury because of the increased infection risk compared with tunneled hemodialysis catheters (TDCs) with longer use. The present study was performed to determine whether primary placement of TDCs in this setting is more appropriate, and whether there are predictors of recovery of renal function in less than 1 week. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the authors' practice, patients referred to the interventional radiology unit in whom no contraindications exist receive a TDC; 76 patients who received a primary TDC for acute kidney injury and who eventually recovered renal function were retrospectively reviewed herein. Causes of renal failure, various renal function parameters, and demographics were collected, as were TDC dwell times, in an effort to determine predictors of recovery and/or extended duration of use. RESULTS: Mean TDC dwell time in patients who eventually recovered from acute kidney injury was 34 days; only 15 of 76 (20%) recovered within 1 week. At TDC placement, there were no significant differences between patients who recovered in less than (vs greater than) 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The present results support primary placement of TDCs in patients with acute kidney injury who require hemodialysis and in whom no contraindications exist, as no predictors of recovery of renal function in less than 1 week were identified.