|
Latest Paper:
J Pediatr. 2012 May 9;:
22575253
Szu-Ta Chen,
Yi-Ning Su,
Yen-Hsuan Ni,
Wuh-Liang Hwu,
Ni-Chung Lee,
Yin-Hsiu Chien,
Cheng-Chi Chang,
Huey-Ling Chen,
Mei-Hwei Chang
Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin County, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnosis of neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) by using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis and a clinical scoring system. STUDY DESIGN: Genetic variations in the 18 coding exons were prescreened using HRM analysis and then confirmed by direct sequencing. To establish a scoring system, clinical features of 20 patients with NICCD diagnosed in Taiwan between the years 2000 and 2008 were compared with those of 47 patients with biliary atresia and 35 with infantile cholestasis. RESULTS: Eight types of mutations/polymorphisms were identified in patients with NICCD, including 5 mutations in the coding region or splice site (c.851del4, c.1638ins23, R553Q, IVS6+5G > A, IVS11+1G > A), and 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (IVS11+17C > G, IVS4+6A > G/rs6957975, and c.1194A > G/rs2301629). The 3 hotspot mutations (c.851del4, c.1638ins23, and IVS6+5G > A) comprised 33/35 (94.3%) mutated alleles. The patients with NICCD had a higher frequency of the rs6957975 polymorphism compared with 103 healthy controls (P <.0001). A 6-point scoring system was proposed according to clinical parameters. The patients with NICCD tended to score ≥4 points, whereas biliary atresia and other infantile cholestasis tended to score <4 points (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HRM analysis was efficient and effective in detecting mutations. Three common mutations comprised the majority of mutations found in our patients. The IVS4+6A > G polymorphism was associated with NICCD. A scoring system may help to differentiate patients with NICCD from those with biliary atresia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
I-Jan Hu,
Pau-Chung Chen,
Suh-Fang Jeng,
Chia-Jung Hsieh,
Hua-Fang Liao,
Yi-Ning Su,
Shio-Jean Lin,
Wu-Shiun Hsieh
Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nationwide stillbirth rate and explore the potential risk factors associated with stillbirths. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from vital registrations during the time period from January 1, 2001 through to December 31, 2004 in Taiwan were used. Stillbirth was defined as fetal death with more than 20 completed weeks' gestational age (GA) or with birth weight more than 500 g if the GA was not known. RESULTS There were a total of 8481 stillbirths identified nationwide between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2004. The stillbirth rate was nine per 1000 total births in the study period, and the proportionate decline was nearly 48.8% in the most recent decade. There was a significant increase in average maternal age during this period. Advanced maternal age and teenage pregnancy were independent significant risk factors for stillbirths even after accounting for the effects of medical conditions that were more likely to occur among these particular age groups. Those fetuses that had been exposed to cord prolapse, maternal cervical incompetence and oligohydramnios/polyhydramnios were especially vulnerable. By contrast, women who had foreign nationality, fetal ultrasound surveys, fetal heart beat monitoring and hastened parturition were less likely to have stillbirth. CONCLUSION The stillbirth rate in Taiwan has remained high despite advancements in medical care. Prenatal evaluation of high risk women may decrease the adverse fetal outcomes.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Yi-Ning Su,
Ming Chen,
Fuu-Jen Tsai,
Yi-Yung Chen,
Gwo-Chin Ma,
Shun-Ping Chang,
Jun-Wei Su,
Yu-Ting Chen,
Wen-Lin Chen,
Li-Feng Chen,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Tsang-Ming Ko,
Yi-Ning Su,
Chin-Yuan Hsu,
Yi-Yung Chen,
Jun-Wei Su,
Wen-Lin Chen,
Chen-Wen Pan,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Yi-Ning Su,
Chih-Long Chang,
Yi-Yung Chen,
Jun-Wei Su,
Schu-Rern Chern,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Shuan-Pei Lin,
Yi-Ning Su,
Fuu-Jen Tsai,
Pei-Chen Wu,
Dai-Dyi Town,
Li-Feng Chen,
Meng-Shan Lee,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVE: To present rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD) of partial trisomy 7q (7q34→qter) and partial monosomy 10q (10q26.12→qter) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using uncultured amniocytes. CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of a previous mentally retarded child with an unbalanced reciprocal translocation inherited from the carrier father who had a karyotype of 46,XY,t(7;10)(q34;q26.12). Her first child was initially found to have a normal karyotype by routine cytogenetic analysis, but a cryptic chromosomal abnormality was subsequently diagnosed by aCGH. During this pregnancy, RAD by oligonucleotide-based aCGH using uncultured amniocytes revealed a 16.4-Mb duplication of 7q34-q36.3 and a 12.7-Mb deletion of 10q26.12-q26.3. Conventional cytogenetic analysis using cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,der(10)t(7;10)(q34;q26.12)pat. The parents elected to terminate the pregnancy. A malformed female fetus was delivered with a high prominent forehead, hypertelorism, epicanthic folds, a broad depressed nasal bridge, a prominent nose with anteverted nostrils, micrognathia, a short neck, large low-set ears, clinodactyly, small big toes, and normal female external genitalia. CONCLUSION: aCGH is a useful tool for RAD of subtle chromosomal rearrangements in pregnancy, especially under the circumstance of a previous abnormal child with an unbalanced translocation derived from a parental subtle reciprocal translocation.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Hsu-Kuang Huang,
Yi-Ning Su,
Schu-Rern Chern,
Jun-Wei Su,
Chen-Chi Lee,
Dai-Dyi Town,
Wen-Lin Chen,
Yu-Ting Chen,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVE: To present prenatal diagnosis of true trisomy 7 mosaicism. MATERIALS, METHODS AND RESULTS: A 36-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+7[20]/46,XY[9]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Repeated amniocentesis was performed at 20 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes manifested a genomic gain in chromosome 7. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on uncultured amniocytes showed a biparental diallelic pattern with a dosage increase in the maternal allele. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed three 7q-specific signals in 13 of 50 (26%) of the cells. The cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 47,XY,+7[12]/46,XY[14]. The ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphisms. Postnatal tissue samplings revealed the mosaic trisomy 7 level of 37.5%(15/40), 30%(12/40), 42.5%(17/40), 82.5%(33/40), 52.5%(21/40), and 27.5%(11/40) in skin, liver, lungs, placenta, membrane, and cord, respectively. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY. PEG1/MEST methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting PCR assay of cord blood showed no uniparental disomy for chromosome 7. CONCLUSION: Interphase FISH, QF-PCR, and aCGH analyses on uncultured amniocytes are useful for rapid distinguishing of true mosaicism from pseudomosaicism for trisomy 7 at amniocentesis. Cord blood sampling for confirmation of fetal trisomy 7 mosaicism is not practical.
Chih-Ping Chen,
Yi-Hui Lin,
Szu-Yuan Chou,
Yi-Ning Su,
Schu-Rern Chern,
Yu-Ting Chen,
Dai-Dyi Town,
Wen-Lin Chen,
Wayseen Wang
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVE: To present the perinatal findings and molecular cytogenetic characterization of prenatally detected mosaic r(21). MATERIALS, METHODS, AND RESULTS: A 29-year-old primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks' gestation because of hyperechogenic cardiac foci and intrauterine growth restriction. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,r(21)[15]/45,XY,-21[5]. The parental karyotypes were normal. The woman requested repeat amniocentesis. Oligonucleotide-based array comparative genomic hybridization was applied to the uncultured amniocytes, rapidly detecting a 2.09-Mb deletion of 21q21.1-q21.2 (21,495,262-23,580,815bp) and a 5.03-Mb deletion of 21q22.3-q22.3 (41,887,412-46,914,715bp). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,r(21)[8]/45,XY,-21[3]/46,XY,idic r(21)[1]. The pregnancy was terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with clinodactyly, short big toes, separation between the first and second toes, prominent nasal bridge, downward slanting palpebral fissures, protuberant occiput, prominent forehead, broad anteverted nasal tip, long philtrum, thin upper lip, small mouth, and micrognathia. The placenta had a karyotype of 46,XY,r(21)[83]/45,XY,-21[11]/46,XY,idic r(21)[6], and the cord blood lymphocytes had a karyotype of 46,XY,r(21)[88]/45,XY,-21[9]/46,XY,idic r(21)[3]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis determined a maternal origin for the deletion. CONCLUSION: An extra interstitial 21q deletion can be associated with mosaic r(21) in addition to a terminal 21q deletion. aCGH is useful in determining the breakpoints and associated subtle structural abnormalities in cases of prenatally detected ring chromosome in order to facilitate genetic counseling.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Mar 23;:
22447252
Shih-Hao Wang,
Chen-Chi Wu,
Ying-Chang Lu,
Yin-Hung Lin,
Yi-Ning Su,
Wuh-Liang Hwu,
I-Shing Yu,
Chuan-Jen Hsu
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otolaryngology, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To explore the genetic characteristics of branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome in an East Asian population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical genetic study. METHODS: Twelve families (total of 18 patients) who fulfilled the criteria for BOR syndrome were enrolled in this study. Mutation screening of the EYA1, SIX1, and SIX5 genes was performed by direct sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and genotype-phenotype correlation was investigated. RESULTS: Two novel EYA1 variants, c.466C>T (p.Q156X) and c.1735delG (p.D579fs), were identified in two multiplex families. The c.466C>T variant resulted in a truncated EYA1 protein, whereas the c.1735delG variant was predicted to encode an EYA1 protein with an abnormal C terminal. Neither variant was identified in a panel of 100 normal controls, and both were cosegregated with the BOR phenotype in the pedigrees, indicating that they were pathogenic mutations. No SIX1 and SIX5 mutations were detected in members of the remaining 10 families. Analysis of the genotype-phenotype correlation revealed a high phenotypic variability between and within BOR families. CONCLUSIONS: Two novel EYA1 mutations (c.466C>T and c.1735delG) were identified in two families with BOR syndrome. SIX1 and SIX5 mutations were not detected in the present study. Further investigation is warranted regarding the contribution of SIX1 and SIX5 mutations to BOR syndrome in East Asian populations.
|
Polish News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|