The case of a 64 year old female patient is presented who has treated herself for 9 months with various Indian Ayurvedic herbal products for her vitiligo and experienced a causally related severe hepatotoxicity (ALT, 601 U/L; AST, 663 U/L; Bilirubin, 5.0 mg/dL). After discontinuation, a rapid improvement was observed. Causality assessment with the updated CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) scale showed a probable causality (+8 points) for Bakuchi tablets containing extracts from Psoralea corylifolia leaves with psoralens as ingredients, as the primary candidate causing the hepatotoxic reaction. The degree of probability was lower with +6 points for other used herbs: Khadin tablets containing extracts from Acacia catechu leaves; Brahmi tablets containing Eclipta alba or Bacopa monnieri; and Usheer tea prepared from Vetivexia zizaniodis. The case is the first report of Indian Ayurvedic herbal products being potentially hepatotoxic in analogy to some other herbs.<br />

Hepatotoxicity by drugs and dietary supplements (DDS) is a rare and unpredictable event but with the risk of a life-threatening clinical course when it occurs. It may emerge despite intensive chemical, toxicological and observational studies that indicate no hepatotoxic signals. This suggests major clinical and regulatory issues that must be addressed in the area of accurate testing, reporting, and accessibility of reliable n data. Consequently, in a clinical setting, safety concerns are key elements in the treatment of patients, and require that the diagnosis of DDS hepatotoxicity clearly be established. Causality of DDS hepatotoxicity may be pursued using a diagnostic algorithm consisting of a pre-test, a main-test as the scale of the updated CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences), and a post-test. The results of these tests are then sent item by item to the National Health Agency, where the case will undergo further evaluation for pharmacovigilance, strategic aspects and safety issues. After this analysis, all items of the tests are included in the regulatory database freely accessible to the health and scientific community. With this diagnostic and regulatory algorithm the risk of misdiagnoses and inappropriate regulatory measures may be minimized and the safety improved. In conclusion,DDS hepatotoxicity is a rare but is a potentially life-threatening entity requiring a reliable diagnosis with the aid of a diagnostic algorithm, and a thorough pharmacovigilance evaluation by national and international health agencies. Safety aspects in DDS hepatotoxicity represent a major clinical and regulatory issue and should consequently be addressed.<br />

OBJECTIVES: Black cohosh (BC) is a herbal drug or herbal dietary supplement used for treatment of menopausal symptoms. Recently, however, reports have appeared about the occurrence of rare toxic liver disease in an assumed relationship with the use of BC. METHODS: We have analyzed and reviewed the data of all 69 reported cases with suspected BC hepatotoxicity. Causality for BC was assessed utilizing the scale of the original structured quantitative Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), or the main-test as its updated form. RESULTS: With the hepatotoxicity specific causality assessment methods, there was an excluded, unlikely, unrelated or unassessable causality for BC in 68 of 69 cases with liver disease. One patient had a possible causality for BC and a symptomatic cholelithiasis with confounding variables of fatty liver of unknown etiology; unknown BC brand including possible herbal mixture; unknown daily BC dosage; and an unassessable duration of BC usage. In general, the cases of the 69 patients were poorly documented. Confounding variables were: failure to identify the BC product; use of herbal mixtures with multiple ingredients in addition to BC; co-medication with synthetic drugs and dietary supplements including herbal ones; missing temporal association between BC use and development of liver disease; not specified modalities of BC treatment; failure of dechallenge after BC discontinuation; pre-existing liver diseases; insufficiently excluded other liver diseases; presence of alternative liver diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of 69 cases shows little, if any, supportive evidence for a significant hepatotoxic risk of BC.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Ethanolic and acetonic kava extracts have previously been causally related to rare hepatotoxicity observed in patients from Germany and Switzerland, but causality assessment was not performed in cases of patients having taken the traditional aqueous kava extracts of South Pacific islands or kava-herbs mixtures. AIM OF THE STUDY: To study the possible hepatotoxicity of aqueous kava extracts of the South Pacific Islands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Causality of hepatotoxicity by aqueous kava extracts and kava-herbs mixtures was assessed, using the updated score of the quantitative CIOMS (Council for the International Organizations of Medical Sciences). RESULTS: Causality was established in five patients from New Caledonia, Australia, the United States and Germany for aqueous kava extracts and kava-herbs mixtures. A comparison with 9 patients from Germany and Switzerland with established causality of hepatotoxicity by ethanolic and acetonic kava extracts reveals that the clinical picture in all 14 patients is similar, independently whether aqueous, ethanolic and acetonic kava extracts or kava-herbs mixtures were used. CONCLUSIONS: Kava hepatotoxicity occurs also with traditional aqueous kava extracts of the South Pacific islands and thereby independently from ethanol or acetone as chemical solvents, suggesting that the toxicity is linked to the kava plant itself with a possibly low quality of the used kava cultivar or kava plant part rather than to chemical solvents.

BACKGROUND: Kava hepatotoxicity in 20 patients from Germany has been debated worldwide following a regulatory ad hoc causality assessment and ban of kava, an anxiolytic herbal remedy obtained from the rhizome of Piper methysticum Forster. AIMS: We assessed causality with a quantitative structured causality analysis in all 20 cases of patients with liver disease, presented by the German regulatory agency that assumed a causal relationship with the use of kava extracts. METHODS: The quantitative scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) in its updated form was employed for causality assessment and quality evaluation of the regulatory data presentation. RESULTS: The regulatory information is scattered and selective, and items essential for causality assessment, such as exclusion of kava independent causes, were not, or only marginally, considered by the regulator. Quantitative causality assessment for kava was possible (n=2), unlikely (n=12), or excluded (n=6), showing no concordance with the regulatory ad hoc causality evaluation. CONCLUSION: The regulatory data regarding kava hepatotoxicity is selective and of low quality, not supportive of the regulatory proposed causality; but instead, is an explanation of the overall causality discussions of kava hepatotoxicity. We are proposing that the regulatory agency reports data in full length and reevaluates causality.

OBJECTIVE:: Black cohosh (BC), synonym for Actaea racemosa and Cimicifuga racemosa, is a herbal remedy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Recently, worldwide discussions have emerged as to whether its use may be associated with the risk of rare hepatotoxicity in a few susceptible women. METHODS:: We have evaluated the causal relationship in nine cases with suspected hepatotoxicity by the use of BC. The updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale was used to quantitatively assess the causality for BC. RESULTS:: In eight of nine patients with liver disease, causality for BC +/- comedication was excluded (n = 4) or unlikely (n = 4). The failure to ascribe causality in these cases was mainly due to alternative diagnosis, missing temporal association and dechallenge, and presentation of low quality data. In only one case, causality was possible for a BC preparation of an unknown brand taken for 2 months with an unknown daily dose. Confounding factors in this case include symptomatic cholelithiasis and fatty liver. Comedication with synthetic drugs and herbal or other dietary supplements was reported in five of nine patients. CONCLUSIONS:: In nine cases of patients with liver disease, causality for BC +/- comedication was possible (n = 1), unlikely (n = 4), or excluded (n = 4). Due to this lack of significant circumstantial evidence, the present study shows little, if any, hepatotoxic risks by the use of BC in the analyzed cases.

Structured causality assessment of hepatotoxicity by drugs and dietary supplements (DDS) is a major clinical challenge, since temporal associations as the sole criteria for a valid evaluation are not acceptable. Initially, a clear intuition for an ad hoc evaluation is necessary, but only provisional, and must be followed by a diagnostic algorithm using a pretest, main test and post test. The evaluation is based on a variety of items such as latency period, course of alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase after DDS discontinuation, risk factors, co-medication, previous information on hepatotoxicity of the DDS, response to rechallenge, and exclusion of other diseases. It is essential that practising and hospital physicians as well as other key health professionals, such as pharmacists, gather all information required for a sound causality assessment, obviating major discussions by expert panels, manufacturers and health agencies in face of scanty and fragmentary data. Because pharmacogenetic alterations may trigger metabolic hepatotoxicity by a few DDS, levels in plasma and urine should be measured and may be helpful for diagnosis. Concomitant genotyping of cytochrome P450 and other enzymes may also be useful in future to minimize the risk of unwanted side-effects, including toxic liver disease elicited by DDS.