BioInfoBank Library


 
author name recommending commenting favorite    papers recom. cited
0 0 0 5 0 72 [Update]

Latest Paper:

go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Box 357370, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Foldit is a multiplayer online game in which players collaborate and compete to create accurate protein structure models. For specific hard problems, Foldit player solutions can in some cases outperform state-of-the-art computational methods. However, very little is known about how collaborative gameplay produces these results and whether Foldit player strategies can be formalized and structured so that they can be used by computers. To determine whether high performing player strategies could be collectively codified, we augmented the Foldit gameplay mechanics with tools for players to encode their folding strategies as "recipes" and to share their recipes with other players, who are able to further modify and redistribute them. Here we describe the rapid social evolution of player-developed folding algorithms that took place in the year following the introduction of these tools. Players developed over 5,400 different recipes, both by creating new algorithms and by modifying and recombining successful recipes developed by other players. The most successful recipes rapidly spread through the Foldit player population, and two of the recipes became particularly dominant. Examination of the algorithms encoded in these two recipes revealed a striking similarity to an unpublished algorithm developed by scientists over the same period. Benchmark calculations show that the new algorithm independently discovered by scientists and by Foldit players outperforms previously published methods. Thus, online scientific game frameworks have the potential not only to solve hard scientific problems, but also to discover and formalize effective new strategies and algorithms.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
What conformations do protein molecules populate in solution? Crystallography provides a high-resolution description of protein structure in the crystal environment, while NMR describes structure in solution but using less data. NMR structures display more variability, but is this because crystal contacts are absent or because of fewer data constraints? Here we report unexpected insight into this issue obtained through analysis of detailed protein energy landscapes generated by large-scale, native-enhanced sampling of conformational space with Rosetta@home for 111 protein domains. In the absence of tightly associating binding partners or ligands, the lowest-energy Rosetta models were nearly all <2.5 Å C(α)RMSD from the experimental structure; this result demonstrates that structure prediction accuracy for globular proteins is limited mainly by the ability to sample close to the native structure. While the lowest-energy models are similar to deposited structures, they are not identical; the largest deviations are most often in regions involved in ligand, quaternary, or crystal contacts. For ligand binding proteins, the low energy models may resemble the apo structures, and for oligomeric proteins, the monomeric assembly intermediates. The deviations between the low energy models and crystal structures largely disappear when landscapes are computed in the context of the crystal lattice or multimer. The computed low-energy ensembles, with tight crystal-structure-like packing in the core, but more NMR-structure-like variability in loops, may in some cases resemble the native state ensembles of proteins better than individual crystal or NMR structures, and can suggest experimentally testable hypotheses relating alternative states and structural heterogeneity to function.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
University of Washington Department of Biochemistry, Box 357350, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
We describe a method based on Rosetta structure refinement for generating high-resolution all-atom protein models from electron cryo-microscopy density maps. A local measure of the fit of a model to the density is used to directly guide structure refinement and to identify regions incompatible with the density that are then targeted for extensive rebuilding. Over a range of test cases using both simulated and experimentally generated data, the method consistently increases the accuracy of starting models generated either by comparative modeling or by hand-tracing the density. The method can achieve near atomic resolution starting from density maps at 4-6A resolution.
go to Publishergo to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
We describe predictions made using the Rosetta structure prediction methodology for both template-based modeling and free modeling categories in the Seventh Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. For the first time, aggressive sampling and all-atom refinement could be carried out for the majority of targets, an advance enabled by the Rosetta@home distributed computing network. Template-based modeling predictions using an iterative refinement algorithm improved over the best existing templates for the majority of proteins with less than 200 residues. Free modeling methods gave near-atomic accuracy predictions for several targets under 100 residues from all secondary structure classes. These results indicate that refinement with an all-atom energy function, although computationally expensive, is a powerful method for obtaining accurate structure predictions. Proteins 2007.(c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
go to Pubmedgo to Scholargo to Googleshow EndNote Citationshow BibTex Citation
Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom.
Classical free-energy methods depend on the definition of physical or nonphysical integration paths to calculate free-energy differences between states. This procedure can be problematic and computationally expensive when the states of interest do not overlap and are far apart in phase space. Here we introduce a novel method to calculate free-energy differences that is path-independent by transforming each end state into a reference state in which the vibrational entropy is the sole component of the total entropy, thus allowing direct computation of the relative free energy. We apply the method to calculate side-chain entropies of a beta-hairpin-forming peptide in a variety of backbone conformations, demonstrating its importance in determining structural propensities. We find that low-free-energy conformations achieve their stability through optimal trade off between enthalpic gains due to favorable interatomic interactions and entropic losses incurred by the same.
Polish News
2012-05-23 19:39:06 © BioInfoBank Institute