OBJECTIVE--To determine whether a program incorporating smoking intervention and use of an inhaled bronchodilator can slow the rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in smokers aged 35 to 60 years who have mild obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN--Randomized clinical trial. Participants randomized with equal probability to one of the following groups:(1) smoking intervention plus bronchodilator,(2) smoking intervention plus placebo, or (3) no intervention. SETTING--Ten clinical centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS--A total of 5887 male and female smokers, aged 35 to 60 years, with spirometric signs of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. INTERVENTIONS--Smoking intervention: intensive 12-session smoking cessation program combining behavior modification and use of nicotine gum, with continuing 5-year maintenance program to minimize relapse. Bronchodilator: ipratropium bromide prescribed three times daily (two puffs per time) from a metered-dose inhaler. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Rate of change and cumulative change in FEV1 over a 5-year period. RESULTS--Participants in the two smoking intervention groups showed significantly smaller declines in FEV1 than did those in the control group. Most of this difference occurred during the first year following entry into the study and was attributable to smoking cessation, with those who achieved sustained smoking cessation experiencing the largest benefit. The small noncumulative benefit associated with use of the active bronchodilator vanished after the bronchodilator was discontinued at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS--An aggressive smoking intervention program significantly reduces the age-related decline in FEV1 in middle-aged smokers with mild airways obstruction. Use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator results in a relatively small improvement in FEV1 that appears to be reversed after the drug is discontinued. Use of the bronchodilator did not influence the long-term decline of FEV1.

The effects of broad-spectrum antibiotic and placebo therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in exacerbation were compared in a randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial. Exacerbations were defined in terms of increased dyspnea, sputum production, and sputum purulence. Exacerbations were followed at 3-day intervals by home visits, and those that resolved in 21 days were designated treatment successes. Treatment failures included exacerbations in which symptoms did not resolve but no intervention was necessary, and those in which the patient's condition deteriorated so that intervention was necessary. Over 3.5 years in 173 patients, 362 exacerbations were treated, 180 with placebo and 182 with antibiotic. The success rate with placebo was 55% and with antibiotic 68%. The rate of failure with deterioration was 19% with placebo and 10% with antibiotic. There was a significant benefit associated with antibiotic. Peak flow recovered more rapidly with antibiotic treatment than with placebo. Side effects were uncommon and did not differ between antibiotic and placebo.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should stop smoking, some do not. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the effect of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide in patients with mild COPD who continued smoking. After a six-month run-in period, we randomly assigned 1277 subjects (mean age, 52 years; mean forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], 77 percent of the predicted value; 73 percent men) to twice-daily treatment with 400 microg of budesonide or placebo, inhaled from a dry-powder inhaler, for three years. RESULTS: Of the 1277 subjects, 912 (71 percent) completed the study. Among these subjects, the median decline in the FEV1 after the use of a bronchodilator over the three-year period was 140 ml in the budesonide group and 180 ml in the placebo group (P=0.05), or 4.3 percent and 5.3 percent of the predicted value, respectively. During the first six months of the study, the FEV1 improved at the rate of 17 ml per year in the budesonide group, as compared with a decline of 81 ml per year in the placebo group (P<0.001). From nine months to the end of treatment, the FEV1 declined at similar rates in the two groups (P=0.39). Ten percent of the subjects in the budesonide group and 4 percent of those in the placebo group had skin bruising (P<0.001). Newly diagnosed hypertension, bone fractures, postcapsular cataracts, myopathy, and diabetes occurred in less than 5 percent of the subjects, and the diagnoses were equally distributed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild COPD who continue smoking, the use of inhaled budesonide is associated with a small one-time improvement in lung function but does not appreciably affect the long-term progressive decline.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated the efficacy of inhaled budesonide on decline in lung function and respiratory symptoms in a 3-year placebo-controlled study of patients with COPD. METHODS: We used a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design in a singlecentre study, nested in a continuing epidemiological survey (the Copenhagen City Heart Study). Inclusion criteria were as follows: no asthma; a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and vital capacity of 0.7 or less; FEV1 which showed no response (<15% change) to 1 mg inhaled terbutaline or prednisolone 37.5 mg orally once daily for 10 days. 290 patients were randomly assigned budesonide, 800 microg plus 400 microg daily for 6 months followed by 400 microg twice daily for 30 months, or placebo for 36 months. The mean age of the participants was 59 years and the mean FEV1 2.37 L or 86% of predicted. The main outcome measure was rate of FEV1 decline. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The crude rates of FEV1 decline were slightly smaller than expected (placebo group 41.8 mL per year, budesonide group 45.1 mL per year). The estimated rates of decline from the regression model did not differ significantly (49.1 mL vs 46.0 mL per year; difference 3.1 mL per year [95% CI -12.8 to 19.0]; p=0.7). Before the study, the minimum relevant difference was defined as 20 mL per year; this difference was outside the 95% CI. No effect of inhaled budesonide was seen on respiratory symptoms. 316 exacerbations occurred during the study period, 155 in the budesonide group and 161 in the placebo group. Treatment was well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Inhaled budesonide was of no clinical benefit in COPD patients recruited from the general population by screening. We question the role of long-term inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of mild to moderate COPD.

OBJECTIVE--A meta-analysis of randomized trials was performed to estimate the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DATA SOURCES--English-language studies published from 1955 through 1994 were retrieved using MEDLINE, Index Medicus, bibliographies, and consultation with experts. MEDLINE search terms included "COPD,""chronic bronchitis," and "antibiotic(s)." STUDY SELECTION--Only randomized trials that enrolled patients having an exacerbation of COPD, used an antibiotic in the treatment group and placebo in the control group, and provided sufficient data to calculate an effect size were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION--Descriptive and outcome data from each study were independently in the meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS--Overall summary effect size of the nine trials satisfying all inclusion criteria was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.34), indicating a small benefit in the antibiotic-treated group. Similar analysis of the six studies that provided data on peak expiratory flow rate changes revealed a summary effect size of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.35) and a summary change in peak expiratory flow rate of 10.75 L/min (95% CI, 4.96 to 16.54 L/min) in favor of the antibiotic-treated group. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect these results. CONCLUSIONS--These analyses suggest a small but statistically significant improvement due to antibiotic therapy in patients with exacerbations of COPD. This antibiotic-associated improvement may be clinically significant, especially in patients with low baseline flow rates.

Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following treatment with placebo, salmeterol 50 microg twice a day or 100 microg twice a day by metered-dose inhaler. Patients completed the disease-specific St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and after 16 wk of treatment. Data from 283 patients (95 patients in the placebo group and 94 in each salmeterol group) were available for HRQoL analysis. Apart from a small difference in ages, all treatment groups were well matched at baseline in terms of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and HRQoL scores. Compared with placebo, salmeterol 50 microg twice a day was associated with significant improvements in SGRQ "Total" and "Impacts" scores which exceeded the threshold for a clinically significant change. This was not seen with salmeterol 100 microg twice a day. Changes in SGRQ and SF-36 scores correlated. They also showed a weak but significant relationship with FEV1. This study has shown that a modest change in lung function may be associated with clinically significant gain in health and well-being in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD. METHODS: We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 microg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance. FINDINGS: 51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0.449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0.001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0.001, p=0.048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0.001), forced vital capacity (p<0.001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0.01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0.004 and p=0.016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0.032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration. INTERPRETATION: Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD.

Treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials usually involve several endpoints such that conventional significance testing can seriously inflate the overall Type I error rate. One option is to select a single primary endpoint for formal statistical inference, but this is not always feasible. Another approach is to apply Bonferroni correction (i.e., multiply each P-value by the total number of endpoints). Its conservatism for correlated endpoints is examined for multivariate normal data. A third approach is to derive an appropriate global test statistic and this paper explores one such test applicable to any set of asymptotically normal test statistics. Quantitative, binary, and survival endpoints are all considered within this general framework. Two examples are presented and the relative merits of the proposed strategies are discussed.

The use of pressurized aerosol inhalers was assessed in a total of 1173 out-patients attending hospital during a three month period. One hundred and thirty-five patients already being treated with drugs by inhalation were found to have a poor inhaler technique, even though most had received instruction on how to use a pressurized aerosol and were considered to be able to use one of these devices correctly. Eighty patients who had not used an inhaler before were found to be unable to use a pressurized aerosol efficiently after reading an instruction pamphlet or having the correct use of an aerosol demonstrated to them. Fifty-one percent of patients studied were observed to have difficulty in co-ordinating aerosol release with inspiration. In 24% the release of aerosol into the mouth caused a halt of inspiration and in a further 12% the aerosol was actuated into the mouth, but inspiration was achieved through the nose with no air being drawn in through the mouth. Twelve percent of patients already being treated with inhalers actuated the aerosol on two or more occasions during one inspiration.

Inhaled corticosteroids are widely prescribed for the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), despite lack of proven efficacy. Because COPD involves airway inflammation and probable protease-antiprotease imbalance, we examined the effect of high dose fluticasone propionate on markers of activity of both pathogenetic mechanisms. Thirteen patients with COPD were treated with fluticasone propionate (500 microg twice a day) for 4 wk, delivered via MDI and spacer, in a double-blind crossover study. There was no clinical benefit in terms of lung function or symptom scores, and induced sputum inflammatory cells, percentage neutrophils, and IL-8 levels were unchanged. Sputum supernatant elastase activity, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-9, and the antiproteases secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (SLPI) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 were similarly unaffected by treatment. These results add to previous evidence that inhaled steroids have no anti-inflammatory action in stable COPD. Furthermore, inhaled steroids do not appear to redress the protease-antiprotease imbalance that is thought to be important in the pathogenesis of airway obstruction.