PURPOSE To evaluate the analgesic effect, safety, and cost-effectiveness of controlled-release oxycodone (CRO) to control postoperative pain in patients with liver cancer who are undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical study received institutional review board approval. After written informed consent was obtained, 210 patients with liver cancer were randomized into three groups of 70 patients. Group 1 received 20 mg of CRO, group 2 received 10 mg of CRO, and group 3 received a placebo at 1 hour before transarterial chemoembolization (T(0)) and 12 (T(12)) and 24 (T(24)) hours after T(0). Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale, percentage of patients with each degree of pain, quality of life, adverse reactions, analgesic costs, and hospital stays were evaluated and compared among the three groups. RESULTS Numeric rating scale scores for pain intensity in group 1 and group 2 were significantly lower than those in group 3 at T(0-12)(P <.001); T(12-24)(P <.001); and T(24-48)(P <.001). When group 1 with group 2 were compared, numeric rating scale scores were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 during the period of T(0-12)(P <.001) but were not significantly different at T(12-24)(P =.68) and T(24-48)(P =.10). Analgesic cost and hospital stay were significantly lower in treated groups than in the placebo group. No significant difference was observed in quality of life and adverse events between the treated groups and the placebo group. CONCLUSION CRO is effective, safe, and cost-effective in the control of postoperative pain after transarterial chemoembolization for patients with inoperable liver cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Although opioid analgesics are used in the management of neuropathic pain syndromes, evidence of their efficacy remains to be established. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of oxycodone in neuropathic pain using postherpetic neuralgia as a model. METHODS: Patients with postherpetic neuralgia of at least moderate intensity were randomized to controlled-release oxycodone 10 mg or placebo every 12 hours, each for 4 weeks, using a double-blind, crossover design. The dose was increased weekly up to a possible maximum of 30 mg every 12 hours. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed daily, and steady (ongoing) pain, brief (paroxysmal) pain, skin pain (allodynia), and pain relief were recorded at weekly visits. Clinical effectiveness, disability, and treatment preference were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled and 38 completed the study (16 men, 22 women, age 70+/-11 years, onset of postherpetic neuralgia 31+/-29 months, duration of pain 18+/-5 hours per day). The oxycodone dose during the final week was 45+/-17 mg per day. Compared with placebo, oxycodone resulted in pain relief (2.9+/-1.2 versus 1.8+/-1.1, p=0.0001) and reductions in steady pain (34+/-26 versus 55+/-27 mm, p=0.0001), allodynia (32+/-26 versus 50+/-30 mm, p=0.0004), and paroxysmal spontaneous pain (22+/-24 versus 42+/-32 mm, p=0.0001). Global effectiveness, disability, and masked patient preference all showed superior scores with oxycodone relative to placebo (1.8+/-1.1 versus 0.7+/-1.0, p=0.0001; 0.3+/-0.8 versus 0.7+/-1.0, p=0.041; 67% versus 11%, p=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Controlled-release oxycodone is an effective analgesic for the management of steady pain, paroxysmal spontaneous pain, and allodynia, which frequently characterize postherpetic neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: Painful neuropathy is one of the most common long-term complications of diabetes mellitus and often proves difficult to relieve.METHODS: Patients with diabetic neuropathy with moderate or greater pain for at least 3 months, were evaluated for efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (QOL) while receiving controlled-release (CR) oxycodone (OxyContin) or active placebo. Patients underwent washout from all opioids 2-7 days before randomization to 10 mg CR oxycodone or active placebo (0.25 mg benztropine) q12h. The dose was increased, approximately weekly, to a maximum of 40 mg q12h CR oxycodone or 1 mg q12h benztropine, with crossover to the alternate treatment after a maximum of 4 weeks. Acetaminophen, 325-650 mg q4-6h prn was provided as rescue.RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy (21 men, 15 women, mean age 63.0+/-9.4 years). CR oxycodone resulted in significantly lower (P=0.0001) mean daily pain (21.8+/-20.7 vs. 48.6+/-26.6 mm VAS), steady pain (23.5+/-23.0 vs. 47.6+/-30.7 mm VAS), brief pain (21.8+/-23.5 vs. 46.7+/-30.8 mm VAS), skin pain (14.3+/-20.4 vs. 43.2+/-31.3 mm VAS), and total pain and disability (16.8+/-15.6 vs. 25.2+/-16.7; P=0.004). Scores from 6 of the 8 SF-36 domains and both summary scales, Standardized Physical Component (P=0.0002) and Standardized Mental Component (P=0.0338) were significantly better during CR oxycodone treatment. The number needed to treat to obtain one patient with at least 50% pain relief is 2.6 and clinical effectiveness scores favoured treatment with CR oxycodone over placebo (P=0.0001).CONCLUSION: CR oxycodone is effective and safe for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy and improves QOL.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Opioid treatment has played a limited role in the management of diabetic neuropathy, in part because of concerns about the responsiveness of neuropathic pain to opioid treatment. This controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of controlled-release (CR) oxycodone in subjects with moderate to severe pain due to diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study included 159 subjects with moderate to severe pain due to diabetic neuropathy. Treatment began with either one 10-mg tablet of CR oxycodone (n = 82) or identical placebo (n = 77) every 12 hours. Doses could be increased every 3 days to a maximum of 6 tablets (60 mg CR oxycodone) every 12 hours. Treatment lasted up to 6 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was overall average daily pain intensity during study days 28 to 42. RESULTS: At an average (SD) dose of 37 (21) mg per day (range 10 to 99 mg/d), CR oxycodone provided more analgesia than placebo (p= 0.002) in the intent-to-treat cohort. From days 28 to 42, overall average daily pain intensity (least squares mean +/-SE), rated in subject diaries on a numeric scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), was 4.1 +/- 0.3 in subjects given CR oxycodone and 5.3 +/- 0.3 in placebo-treated subjects. Overall, 80 (96%) of 82 subjects given CR oxycodone and 52 (68%) of 77 subjects who received placebo reported adverse events. The most common adverse events in the CR oxycodone group were opioid related. CONCLUSIONS: In this 6-week trial, CR oxycodone was effective for the treatment of moderate to severe pain due to diabetic neuropathy. Adverse events were typical of opioid-related side effects.

An expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care has revised and updated its guidelines on the use of morphine in the management of cancer pain. The revised recommendations presented here give guidance on the use of morphine and the alternative strong opioid analgesics which have been introduced in many parts of the world in recent years. Practical strategies for dealing with difficult situations are described presenting a consensus view where supporting evidence is lacking. The strength of the evidence on which each recommendation is based is indicated.

BACKGROUND: Although opioid analgesics have well-defined efficacy and safety in treatment of chronic cancer pain, further research is needed to define their role in treatment of chronic noncancer pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of controlled-release oxycodone (OxyContin tablets) treatment on pain and function and its safety vs placebo and in long-term use in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three patients experiencing persistent osteoarthritis-related pain for at least 1 month were randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 45) or 10 mg (n = 44) or 20 mg (n = 44) of controlled-release oxycodone every 12 hours for 14 days. One hundred six patients enrolled in an open-label, 6-month extension trial; treatment for an additional 12 months was optional. RESULTS: Use of controlled-release oxycodone, 20 mg, was superior (P<.05) to placebo in reducing pain intensity and the interference of pain with mood, sleep, and enjoyment of life. During long-term treatment, the mean dose remained stable at approximately 40 mg/d after titration, and pain intensity was stable. Fifty-eight patients completed 6 months of treatment, 41 completed 12 months, and 15 completed 18 months. Common opioid side effects were reported, several of which decreased in duration as therapy continued. CONCLUSIONS: Around-the-clock controlled-release oxycodone therapy seemed to be effective and safe for patients with chronic, moderate to severe, osteo-arthritis-related pain. Effective analgesia was accompanied by a reduction in the interference of pain with mood, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Analgesia was maintained during long-term treatment, and the daily dose remained stable after titration. Typical opioid side effects were reported during short- and long-term therapy.

In a double-blind crossover study, morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride were administered to 20 patients who were experiencing severe cancer pain. The peroral doses were determined on the basis of patient-controlled intravenous titration. The assumed oral bioavailability ratios were 44%(group 1, first 10 patients) and 33%(group 2, last 10 patients) for morphine and 66%(group 1) and 50%(group 2) for oxycodone hydrochloride, respectively. However, the patients were able to readjust their oral dosings. Equal analgesia was achieved with both drugs, but the intravenous dose of oxycodone hydrochloride needed was 30% higher than that of morphine. The median calculated oral/intravenous ratios giving comparable analgesia were 0.31 for morphine and 0.70 for oxycodone hydrochloride. Morphine caused more nausea than oxycodone hydrochloride and hallucinations occurred only during morphine treatment. Otherwise, there were no major differences in the side effects between these two opioids.

OBJECTIVE (BACKGROUND): Amitriptyline (AT) is a standard therapy for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Our hypothesis was that nortriptyline (NT), a noradrenergic metabolite of AT, may be more effective. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of AT versus NT was conducted in 33 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients completed the trial. Twenty-one of 31 (67.7%) had at least a good response to AT or NT, or both. We found no difference with regard to relief of steady, brief, or skin pain by visual analog scales for pain and pain relief; mood; disability; satisfaction; or preference between the two drugs. Intolerable side effects were more common with AT. Most patients (26/33) were not depressed, and most responding showed no change in rating scales for depression despite the occurrence of pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that this study provides a scientific basis for an analgesic action of NT in PHN because pain relief occurred without an antidepressant effect, and that although there were fewer side effects with NT, AT and NT appear to have a similar analgesic action for most individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of controlled release oxycodone given every 12 h around the clock with immediate release oxycodone-acetaminophen (APAP) given 4 times daily for osteoarthritis (OA) pain. METHODS: Adults (n=167) with moderate to severe OA pain despite regular use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) entered open label titration for 30 days with immediate release oxycodone qid; 107 qualified for randomization to double blind, parallel group treatment for 30 days with placebo, controlled release oxycodone, or immediate release oxycodone-APAP. RESULTS: Following titration with immediate release oxycodone, mean (SE) pain intensity (0, none to 3, severe) decreased from 2.44 (0.04) to 1.38 (0.05)(p=0.0001), and quality of sleep (1, very poor; 5, excellent) improved from 2.58 (0.08) to 3.57 (0.07)(p=0.0001). Mean dose was about 40 mg/day. Pain intensity and quality of sleep were significantly improved in both active groups compared with the placebo group (p< or =0.05) during the double blind trial. Pain intensity and sleep scores were comparable in both active groups during double blind treatment. Nausea (p=0.03) and dry mouth (p=0.09) were less common with controlled release oxycodone than immediate release oxycodone-APAP. CONCLUSION: Controlled release oxycodone q12h and immediate release oxycodone-APAP qid, added to NSAID, were superior to placebo for reducing OA pain and improving quality of sleep. The active treatments provided comparable pain control and sleep quality. Controlled release oxycodone was associated with a lower incidence of some side effects.

Controlled-release (CR) formulations of oxycodone and morphine were compared in 45 patients with chronic cancer pain. The study was started with an open-label, randomised titration phase to achieve stable pain control for at least 48 h, followed by a double-blind, randomised, crossover phase in two periods, 3-6 days each. To blind the study using available tablet strengths, the dose ratio of oxycodone to morphine was set at 2:3. A daily telephone contact was maintained between the patient and the investigator. The patients were asked to assess pain intensity four times a day and acceptability of therapy twice daily, and to record possible adverse effects. Pharmacodynamic evaluations were performed at the end of each double-blind period. The patients were allowed to use escape analgesic (respective opioid as oral solution) as needed. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for both safety and efficacy. Pain was well-controlled during both stable phases. When the period effect was taken into account the two opioids provided comparable analgesia. If the results of the two periods were combined, the patients consumed significantly more escape doses and the mean pain intensities were significantly greater with CR oxycodone. The total opioid consumption ratio of oxycodone to morphine was 2:3 when oxycodone was administered first, and 3:4 when oxycodone was administered after morphine. The total incidence of adverse experiences reported by the patients was similar, but significantly more vomiting occurred with morphine, whereas constipation was more common with oxycodone.

1. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oxycodone were studied in nine healthy young volunteers in a cross-over study. Each subject received oxycodone chloride once intramuscularly (0.14 mg kg-1) and twice orally (0.28 mg kg-1) at intervals of 2 weeks. A double-blind randomized pretreatment with amitriptyline (10-50 mg a day) or placebo was given prior to oral oxycodone. 2. The concentrations of oxycodone, noroxycodone and oxymorphone in plasma and the 24 h urine recoveries of their conjugated and unconjugated forms were measured by gas chromatography. 3. No differences were found between treatments in mean Cmax and AUC values of oxycodone which varied from 34 to 38 ng ml-1 and from 208 to 245 ng ml-1 h, respectively. The median tmax of oxycodone was 1 h in all groups. The bioavailability of oral relative to i.m. oxycodone was 60%. The mean renal clearance of oxycodone was 0.07-0.08 l min-1. The kinetics of oxycodone were unaffected by amitriptyline. 4. The mean ratio of the AUC(0.24 h) values of unconjugated noroxycodone to oxycodone was 0.45 after i.m. oxycodone and 0.6-0.8 after oral oxycodone. Plasma oxymorphone concentrations were below the limit of the assay. Eight to 14% of the dose of oxycodone was excreted in the urine as unconjugated and conjugated oxycodone over 24 h. Oxymorphone was excreted mainly as a conjugate whereas noroxycodone was recovered mostly in an unconjugated form.