The present study investigated the potential efficacy of buspirone for treating marijuana dependence. Participants received either buspirone (maximum 60mg/day)(n=23) or matching placebo (n=27) for 12 weeks, each in conjunction with motivational interviewing. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage of negative UDS results in the buspirone-treatment group was 18 percentage points higher than the placebo-treatment group (95% CI:-2% to 37%, p=0.071). On self-report, participants receiving buspirone reported not using marijuana 45.2% of days and participants receiving placebo reported not using 51.4% of days (p=0.55). An analysis of participants that completed the 12-week trial showed a significant difference in the percentage negative UDS (95% CI: 7-63%, p=0.014) and a trend for participants randomized to the buspirone-treatment group who completed treatment to achieve the first negative UDS result sooner than those participants treated with placebo (p=0.054). Further study with buspirone in this population may be warranted; however, strategies to enhance study retention and improve outcome measurement should be considered in future trials.

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by chronic worry that may persist for many years. It is a debilitating disorder, and effective long-term treatment is required. Psychotherapy, particularly relaxation, cognitive therapy, and cognitive-behavioral therapy, has shown long-term benefit in GAD and may be a useful approach alone and as an adjunct to pharmacotherapeutic options. Available medications for GAD include benzodiazepine anxiolytics, buspirone, and antidepressants. Although benzodiazepines are effective as short-term anxiolytics, their use is compromised by a poor adverse event profile and, like buspirone, they lack the antidepressant efficacy important for addressing the comorbid depression experienced by many patients with GAD. Antidepressants, including paroxetine and the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, are effective anxiolytics and resolve symptoms of depression in patients with GAD. The benefit of venlafaxine is sustained long term, enabling increased numbers of patients to attain remission from symptoms and experience restoration of normal functioning. Although further clinical studies are required to establish the use of psychosocial therapy in the treatment of GAD. preliminary results are encouraging. At present, the use of psychosocial therapy and second-generation antidepressants, such as some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine, offer the best approach to attaining long-term benefit for patients with GAD.

The present series of experiments compared the behavioral effects of the novel non-peptide CRF antagonist CP-154,526 with those of diazepam and the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist buspirone in classical animal models of anxiety including conflict tests (punished lever pressing and punished drinking tests in rats) and exploratory models (elevated plus-maze test in rats, light/dark choice and free-exploration tests in mice), and a recently developed mouse defense test battery (MDTB) which has been validated for the screening of anxiolytic drugs. Results from both conflict procedures showed that diazepam (2.5-10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced clear anxiolytic-like effects, whereas buspirone (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) displayed anticonflict activity in the punished drinking test only. CP-154,526 (0.6-20 mg/kg) was devoid of significant activity in both procedures. In the elevated plus-maze, diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced significant effects on traditional (i.e. spatio-temporal) and ethologically derived (i.e. risk assessment and directed exploration) indices of anxiety. Buspirone (1-4 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced risk assessment activities only, and CP-154,526 (0.6-20 mg/kg, i.p.) did not modify the indices of anxiety in the elevated plus-maze. In the light/dark test, diazepam (2.5-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and CP-154,526 (10-40 mg/kg, i.p.) affected all behavioral indices of anxiety, while buspirone reduced risk assessment activities at the highest doses only (10 and 15 mg/kg, i.p.). In the free-exploration test, diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced avoidance responses towards novelty, as indicated by the increase in exploratory activity in a novel compartment and the decrease in risk assessment. CP-154,526 failed to affect the former behavior and weakly reduced the latter (5 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.). Buspirone (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.) was inactive in this test. Finally, in the MDTB, diazepam (0.5-3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated all defensive reactions of mice confronted with a rat stimulus (i.e. flight, risk assessment and defensive attack) or with a situation associated with this threat (i.e. contextual defense). Buspirone (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced defensive attack and contextual defense, while CP-154,526 (5-20 mg/kg, i.p.) affected all defensive behaviors, with the exception of one risk assessment measure. The finding that CP-154,526 displayed positive effects in mice but not in rats may be due to increased sensitivity to environmental stress of the strains used (i.e. BALB/c, Swiss) and/or to the fact that animals were exposed to unavoidable stress stimuli which may lead to a significant activation of the CRF system. Although in mice the anxiety-reducing potential of CP-154,526 is superior to that of the atypical anxiolytic buspirone, it is smaller in terms of the magnitude of the effects and the number of indices of anxiety affected than that of diazepam.

The azapirone class of anxiolytic drugs is being evaluated for clinical use in the treatment of depression. Buspirone, a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) partial agonist active at the 5-HT1A receptor subtype, was evaluated in the treatment of depression in a series of five placebo-controlled, parallel group studies involving 382 patients with DSM-III major depression and significant associated anxiety symptoms (both Hamilton depression [HAM-D] and Hamilton anxiety [HAM-A] scales greater than or equal to 18). Buspirone therapy was initiated at 15 mg/day with individual dose titration to a maximum of 90 mg/day and resulted in marked improvement in both depressive and anxiety symptoms. Analyses of the composite data base from the five studies show significant (p less than 0.05) improvement in mean HAM-D, HAM-A, and Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale ratings for buspirone-treated compared with placebo-treated patients. Of particular interest was significant improvement in cardinal depression symptoms, e.g., depressed mood, guilt, work and interest, anergia, and diurnal variation of mood. Subset analyses revealed that patients with melancholic-type major depression and patients with more severe symptoms (judged by higher initial HAM-D or HAM-A total scores) responded better to buspirone than did patients who were less ill. The buspirone dose most frequently associated with clinically significant improvement was 40 mg/day. Gepirone, an analogue of buspirone with highly selective binding affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor subtype, also shows promise of antidepressant efficacy in preliminary controlled clinical trials. These data suggest that azapirones, which as partial agonists modulate 5-HT1A receptor function, have clinically important antidepressant properties.

To evaluate the possible influence of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), we analyzed data from a placebo-controlled trial designed to explore the efficacy of buspirone as add-on treatment for patients not responding to an SSRI alone. At baseline, all patients met the criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV and had received citalopram or paroxetine during a minimum of 4 weeks without responding to the treatment. Buspirone (flexible dosage, 20-60 mg/day) or placebo was added to the SSRI for 4 weeks; the mean daily dose of buspirone at endpoint was 48.5 mg (SD = 1.0). Sexual dysfunction was evaluated using a structured interview. Before starting medication with buspirone or placebo, 40%(47 of 117) reported at least one kind of sexual dysfunction (decreased libido, ejaculatory dysfunction, orgasmic dysfunction). During the 4 weeks of treatment, approximately 58% of subjects treated with buspirone reported an improvement with respect to sexual function; in the placebo group, the response rate was 30%. The difference between placebo and active drug treatment was more pronounced in women than in men. The response was obvious during the first week, with no further improvement during the course of the study. It is suggested that the effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction is a result of a reversal of SSRI-induced sexual side effects rather than of an antidepressant effect of the drug.

OBJECTIVE: Few controlled trials of pharmacologic intervention in women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction have been reported, and there is uncertainty about the usefulness of putative treatments and the assessment methodologies. The authors evaluated the efficacy of buspirone and amantadine in the treatment of sexual dysfunction associated with fluoxetine administration. METHOD: Women who had been successfully treated with fluoxetine for at least 8 weeks and who had reported a deterioration in sexual function not present before the initiation of fluoxetine entered a 4-week assessment period. After assessment they were randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment trial with buspirone (N=19), amantadine (N=18), or placebo (N=20). Outcomes were assessed by using a patient-rated daily diary and a clinician-rated structured interview. RESULTS: While the amantadine-treated women did report significantly greater improvements in energy levels than women in the placebo group, all treatment groups experienced improvement in overall sexual function as well as in most individual measures. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither buspirone nor amantadine was more effective than placebo in ameliorating antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction. All groups experienced marked nonspecific improvement during treatment, which suggests the importance of placebo-controlled trials for this condition.

Buspirone is an anxiolytic agent that appears to have no sedative effects. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of buspirone on breathlessness and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic airway obstruction. Sixteen patients, age 56.9 +/- 17.0; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 1.15 +/- 0.42 l; FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) 50.7 +/- 15.0%; PaCO2 42.2 +/- 5.5 mm Hg; and PaO2 57.6 +/- 10 mm Hg, underwent a 6-min walking test, an incremental cycle ergometer test, an incremental treadmill walking test with self-assessment of dyspnea on Borg's scale during exercise and an assessment of respiratory drive (P 0.1), timing [inspiration time (TI)/total breathing time (Ttot)], PaO2, PaCO2, FVC, FEV1, following oral administration for 14 days of placebo or buspirone (20 mg daily) in a double-blind, cross-over randomized way. We also used the symptom check list-90-R for the assessment of subjective complaints and symptomatic behavior. A significant improvement in anxiety, depression and obsessive symptoms and complaints was noted after buspirone treatment. The P 0.1, TI/Ttot, arterial blood gases and respiratory mechanics did not change after drug treatment. There was an improvement in exercise tolerance and in the sensation of dyspnea during the buspirone period. Thus, as given in this study, oral buspirone has therapeutic potential in the treatment of dyspnea in patients with chronic lung disease.

Anxiety has historically been treated by agents with a sedative component to their action. In the last decade or so it has been determined that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors may mediate the anxiolytic actions of the benzodiazepines, propanediol carbamates, barbiturates, and ethanol. However, inasmuch as these drugs have additional pharmacological properties (sedation, muscle relaxation, seizure control), the search for an anxioselective drug was continued. Buspirone appears to be such a drug. Clinical studies have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder without the ancillary pharmacology of earlier anxiolytics. Buspirone does not act on the GABA receptor. Rather, its most salient interaction with neurotransmitter receptors occurs at the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor. This action is supported by studies focused on receptor binding, anatomical localization, biochemistry, neurophysiology, and animal behavior. The recognition that action at 5-HT1A receptors may be a viable approach to the pharmacotherapy of anxiety is evidenced by the number of other agents of this class under development by a number of pharmaceutical companies.

When exposed to prolonged stress, rats develop gastric ulceration, enhanced colon motility with depletion of its mucin content and signs of physiological and behavioral arousal. In this model, we tested whether antidepressants (fluoxetine and bupropion), anxiolytics (diazepam and buspirone) or the novel nonpeptide corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) type-1 receptor (CRH-R1) antagonist, antalarmin, modify these responses. Fluoxetine, bupropion, diazepam and antalarmin all suppressed stress-induced gastric ulceration in male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to four hours of plain immobilization. Antalarmin produced the most pronounced anti-ulcer effect and additionally suppressed the stress-induced colonic hypermotility, mucin depletion, autonomic hyperarousal and struggling behavior. Intraperitoneal CRH administration reproduced the intestinal but not the gastric responses to stress while vagotomy antagonized the stress-induced gastric ulceration but not the intestinal responses. We conclude that brain CRH-R1 and vagal pathways are essential for gastric ulceration to occur in response to stress and that peripheral CRH-R1 mediates colonic hypermotility and mucin depletion in this model. Nonpeptide CRH-R1 antagonists may therefore be prophylactic against stress ulcer in the critically ill and therapeutic for other pathogenetically related gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anxiolytic drugs in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is conventionally assessed by evaluating changes in the total score of psychometric scales such as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). The purpose of this pooled analysis of data was to evaluate the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (XR) on individual items of the HAM-A and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). METHOD: Data were pooled from 5 studies of patients with GAD who were treated with either venlafaxine XR or placebo for 8 weeks (N = 2,021) and up to 6 months (N = 767). Individual items of the HAM-A and the BSA were examined. and, using the mean changes from baseline to endpoint, an effect size for each item was calculated by dividing the difference between baseline and endpoint values for each item by the standard deviation of this difference. The effect sizes determined for the venlafaxine group were compared with those for the placebo group. Items from each scale that are concordant with the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD were selected for further examination, and the specific effect sizes of each item were expressed after controlling for placebo effects. RESULTS: The effect size of the majority of the 14 items of the HAM-A scale and the 10 items of the BSA scale associated with treatment with venlafaxine XR was greater than with placebo at both 8 weeks and 6 months. Furthermore, the effect sizes at 6 months were generally greater than at 8 weeks in venlafaxine XR-treated patients. Effect sizes associated with venlafaxine XR were greatest for the HAM-A items that were most closely related to diagnostic symptoms of GAD, namely anxious mood, tension, intellectual functioning, and behavior at interview at both 8 weeks and 6 months. Similarly, GAD-related BSA items of inner tension, worrying over trifles, hostile feelings, and muscular tension were associated with the greatest improvements with venlafaxine XR at both time-points. CONCLUSION: The HAM-A and BSA items that most closely corresponded to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD showed the largest improvement during treatment with venlafaxine XR. This indicates that the specific symptoms of GAD can be treated effectively with venlafaxine XR, both in the short and longer term.

Progress in understanding the pharmacological nature of tobacco addiction, along with the modest success rates achieved by the nicotine replacement therapies, has provided the major impetus for the development of non-nicotine drugs as smoking cessation aids. This article reviews evidence from controlled trials of several non-nicotine medications for the treatment of nicotine dependence. Clonidine was the first non-nicotine medication to show efficacy for smoking cessation in multiple studies, but its effect was found to be limited at best. Positive results across several trials have been consistently demonstrated for amfebutamone (bupropion). Encouraging results have also been observed for nortriptyline and moclobemide. Studies of combined treatments using non-nicotine medications (amfebutamone, mecamylamine, oral dextrose) with nicotine replacement therapy suggest increased efficacy relative to treatments using one or the other treatment strategy alone. Thus, available evidence indicates that non-nicotine drug treatments offer a promising panoply of therapeutic strategies for the addicted smoker.