BACKGROUND: Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies occurring in approximately (1/300) male births. If it is not surgically corrected the consequences may negatively impact on quality of life in adolescents. The surgery is very invasive and the post-operative phase very painful. To improve the control of post-operative pain, continuous analgesia via epidural catheter was implemented. AIMS: To compare the effectiveness in controlling pain of two different regimens: continuous epidural catheter infusion vs oral and rectal non-steroidal pain-killers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative study on children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Group A (catheter) was treated with continuous postoperative analgesia via epidural catheter and Group B (scheduled times) with rectal and oral analgesics at scheduled times and on demand, after caudal block. In both groups nurses measured pain with VAS and FLACC scales (score from 0 to 10) for 72 hours after surgery. RESULTS: 41 children were studied (average age 64.1 months, SD 47.3), with 332 post-operative pain recordings (Group A n = 161, Group B n = 171). Mean pain score of Group A was 0.13 (SD 0.3) and 0.45 (SD 0.8) in group B, p = 0.006. The median duration of the epidural catheter was 65 hours, mean 51.8 hours (SD 24.3). During the 1st post-operative medication, the mean pain score in Group A was 1.2 (SD 1.4), and 3.2 (SD 1.8) in group B, p = 0.003. In group A the number of pain scores indicating pain (> 0) where 3.1% while in group B were 10.5%, p = 0.0007. CONCLUSIONS: In children undergoing hypospadias surgery, post-operative analgesia with continuous epidural catheter infusion seems to offer a better analgesic coverage than the traditional oral/rectal analgesic treatment at scheduled times and on demand.

OBJECTIVE: Pain is the cardinal feature of osteoarthritis (OA), and with advancing disease there is loss of function and increasing pain even at times of joint rest. Few studies have evaluated the role of opioid analgesics in treating the pain of OA. METHODS: This randomized, double blind, parallel group study compared the efficacy and safety of a 12 hourly controlled release codeine formulation (Codeine Contin) with placebo in patients with chronic pain due to OA of the hips and/or knees. The 4 week treatment period, following an analgesic washout phase of 2-7 days, included weekly clinic evaluations, at which the dose was escalated as appropriate, and daily patient diary completion. Pain (daily), stiffness, and physical function (weekly) were assessed using the multidimensional, self-administered WOMAC (visual analog scale version) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-six eligible patients completed the study. The mean initial and final daily doses of controlled release codeine were 50 mg every 12 h at baseline and 159 mg every 12 h at the final assessment. All variables in the efficacy analysis indicated superiority of controlled release codeine over placebo. The WOMAC pain scale showed an improvement of 44.8% over baseline in the controlled release codeine group compared with 12.3% taking placebo (p = 0.0004). For the WOMAC stiffness and physical function scales the improvements over baseline on controlled release codeine were 47.7% and 49.3%, respectively compared with 17.0% and 17.0%, respectively, with placebo (p = 0.003; p = 0.0007). Controlled release codeine was also significantly better than placebo on measures of sleep quality and requirement for supplemental acetaminophen. CONCLUSION: Single entity controlled release codeine is an effective treatment for pain due to OA of the hip or knee.

As no adequate comparison of these widely used drugs has been made, we have performed a double-blind cross-over trial in 30 individuals with chronic diarrhea. Each underwent three randomized treatment periods of 4 wk duration. Patients were instructed to increase the daily dose gradually until control was achieved or side effects became intolerable. Stool frequency, consistency, urgency, and incontinence were then compared when a stable dose was reached. Though 2.3 capsules (4.6 mg) of loperamide, 2.3 capsules (103.5 mg) of codeine and 2.5 capsulses (12.5 mg) of diphenoxylate all reduced stool frequency to the same extent, diphenoxylate was significantly less effective in producing a solid stool. Before treatment 95% of patients experienced urgency, sometimes associated with fecal incontinence, often as their major diability. Loperamide and codeine were more effective in relieving this than was diphenoxylate. Side effects, particularly central nervous effects, were greatest with diphenoxylate and least with loperamide. Approximately equal numbers discontinued each preparation; poor control and central-nervous-system side effects were the usual reasons for stopping diphenoxylate and codeine, and abdominal pain and constipation for stopping loperamide. We conclude that both loperamide and codeine phosphate are superior to diphenoxylate in the symptomatic treatment of chronic diarrhea.

Two-hundred six outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 and 20 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. Analgesia was similar for ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg; however, these treatments were superior to acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination. The analgesic effect of each active medication was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 5-6 hours. The data suggest a plateau in ketorolac's analgesic efficacy at the 10-mg level. Repeat-dose data indicated that on the day of surgery ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were superior to acetaminophen 600 mg; ketorolac 20 mg was also superior to acetaminophen-codeine. Differences among active medications were not significant when data for the entire postoperative period (days 0-6) were evaluated. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications.

BACKGROUND: Oscillatory breathing patterns characterized by rises and falls in ventilation with apnea (Cheyne-Stokes respiration [CSR]) or without apnea (periodic breathing [PB]) commonly occur during the daytime in chronic heart failure (CHF). We have prospectively characterized patients with cyclical breathing in terms of clinical characteristics, indices of autonomic control, prognosis, and the role of peripheral chemosensitivity. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine cyclical breathing pattern, power spectral analysis was applied to 30-minute recordings of respiration in 74 stable CHF patients. Analyses of heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity were used to assess autonomic balance. Peripheral chemosensitivity was assessed with the transient hypoxia method. We also determined whether the suppression of peripheral chemoreceptor activity (hyperoxia or dihydrocodeine) would influence the respiratory pattern. Cyclical respiration was found in 49 (66%) patients (22 [30%] CSR, 27 [36%] PB) and was associated with more advanced CHF symptoms, impaired autonomic balance, and increased chemosensitivity (0.80 and 0.75 versus 0.34 L. min(-1).%SaO(2)(-1), P<0.001, for CSR and PB versus normal breathing, respectively). Transient hyperoxia abolished oscillatory breathing in 7 of 8 patients. Dihydrocodeine administration decreased chemosensitivity by 42%(P=0.05), which correlated with improvement in respiratory pattern. Cyclical breathing predicted poor 2-year survival (relative risk 9.41, P<0.01, by Cox proportional hazards analysis), independent of peak oxygen consumption (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An oscillatory breathing pattern during the daytime is a marker of impaired autonomic regulation and poor outcome. Augmented activity of peripheral chemoreceptors may be involved in the genesis of this respiratory pattern. Modulation of peripheral chemosensitivity can reduce or abolish abnormal respiratory patterns and may be an option in the management of CHF patients with oscillatory breathing.

Plasma concentrations of codeine and morphine were determined by specific radioimmunoassays in healthy human subjects at various times following oral administration of analgesic preparations containing therapeutic doses of codeine phosphate. Following administration of codeine phosphate (60 mg) in combination with aspirin (650 mg) or acetaminophen (600 mg) to two separate groups, mean peak codeine plasma concentrations and beta-phase elimination half-lives were 159 ng/ml and 2.9 hr or 138 ng/ml and 2.4 hr, respectively. Mean maximum concentrations of metabolically produced morphine were 6.8 ng/ml (aspirin-codeine phosphate administration) and 7.4 ng/ml (acetaminophen-codeine phosphate). Following drug administration, the mean ratio of the areas under the respective plasma concentration-time curves for morphine and codeine was 0.095 for the aspirin-codeine phosphate study and 0.12 for the acetaminophen-codeine phosphate study. Thus, free morphine represented about 10% of the free codeine area in each case. These results support the hypothesis that metabolically produced morphine may influence or be responsible for the analgesic efficacy of codeine.

Six rationales for using combination analgesics are identified, but most combinations are formulated with two rationales in mind: enhancement of analgesia and reduction of adverse effects by combining two analgesics with different mechanisms of action. Acetaminophen and aspirin are the mainstays of oral analgesic combinations. There is substantial evidence that combining an optimal dose of acetaminophen or aspirin with an oral opioid such as codeine, hydrocodone, or oxycodone produces an additive analgesic effect greater than that obtained by doubling the dose of either constituent administered alone. There is also some evidence that the adverse effects produced by such combinations are less than would be produced by an equi-analgesic dose of a single constituent. The physician need not be confined to existing fixed-ratio combinations; he or she may extemporize to the patient's advantage by co-administering acetaminophen, aspirin, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with available oral opioids and, in select situations, co-administering oral or injectable analgesics with psychoactive drugs.