Gliclazide is a second generation of hypoglycemic sulfonylurea and acts selectively on pancreatic beta cell to control diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to produce a controlled release system of gliclazide using chitosan beads. Chitosan beads were produced by dispersion technique using tripolyphosphate (TPP) as gelating agent. The effects of process variables including chitosan molecular weight, concentration of chitosan and TPP, pH of TPP, and cross-linking time after addition of chitosan were evaluated by Taguchi design on the rate of drug release, mean release time (MRT), release efficiency (RE(8)%), and particle size of the beads. The blood glucose lowering effect of the beads was studied in normal and streptozotocin-diabetic rats. The optimized formulation CL(2)T(5)P(2)t(10) with about 31% drug loading, 2.4 h MRT, and 69.16% RE(8)% decreased blood glucose level in normal rats for 24 h compared to pure powder of gliclazide that lasted for just 10 h.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden remains the predominant cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and in most of the developed world. The ongoing twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus provide a groundswell source for sustaining this trend for the foreseeable future (increasing the prevalence of CVD by 2-4 times), unless radical changes are made in public health policy. Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) remain a mainstay for management of type 2 diabetes in most practice settings. Although these agents are primarily prescribed to achieve better glycemic control, it is important to evaluate what effects they have on cardiovascular risk and whether there are significant differences in effects among the different OHAs. This review presents the available data on the effects of the various OHAs on cardiovascular risk surrogates and actual events in retrospective and prospective study design settings.

Several factors influence diabetes control, and many of these can adversely affect endeavors to obtain optimal glycemic management. For many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the passage of time often results in a loss of responsiveness to medication and a greater difficulty in achieving desired target levels. Although these observations in part reflect a natural progression of diabetes, irrespective of treatment given, it is possible to identify modifiable hurdles that can be addressed with better outcome results. Lifestyle measures, particularly diet and exercise, remain paramount, whereas other secondary confounding factors such as systemic or endocrine disease or other conflicting medication need specific therapeutic attention. Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will require oral hypoglycemic medication and this should be prescribed in the simplest, most effective, and safest way. Ensuring that patients fully understand treatment objectives is important resulting in better compliance with advised treatment. Such compliance can be significantly improved by keeping treatment regimens simple. With its novel once-daily formulation, gliclazide modified release has been shown to improve adherence to medication and result in better glycemic outcome as determined by improved HbA(1c) levels. Its benefits in terms of reduced risk of hypoglycemia have been demonstrated in the GlUcose control In type 2 diabetes: Diamicron modified release versus glimEpiride study.

Gliclazide modified release (MR) is a new formulation of the drug gliclazide and is given once daily. The specifically designed hydrophilic matrix of gliclazide MR leads to a progressive drug release that parallels the 24-hour glycemic profile in type 2 diabetic patients. Development studies showed a sustained efficacy over 2 years coupled with a very good acceptability. Gliclazide MR acts selectively on adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium (K(ATP)) channels of the pancreatic beta cell. No interaction with cardiovascular K(ATP) channels has been shown, indicating that the drug can be safely used in patients with ischemic heart disease. In addition, gliclazide MR shows the ability to inhibit key mechanisms in diabetic angiopathy, independently of glycemic control.

Gliclazide modified release (MR) is a new formulation of the drug gliclazide and is given once daily. The hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose-based polymer in the new formulation effects a progressive release of the drug which parallels the 24-hour glycaemic profile in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The formulation shows high bioavailability and its absorption profile is unaffected by coadministration with food. Mean plasma glucose levels are significantly reduced over a 24-hour period in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with gliclazide MR once daily, in both fasting and postprandial states. No cardiovascular ATP-sensitive potassium channel interaction has been observed at therapeutic concentrations of gliclazide MR. Gliclazide MR has also demonstrated antioxidant properties that are independent of glycaemic control. In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study, gliclazide MR 30 to 120 mg once daily showed similar efficacy to gliclazide immediate release (IR) 80 to 320 mg/day (in divided doses for doses >80 mg) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over a 10-month period, reducing glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to a similar extent. The drug appeared most efficacious in patients who had previously been treated by diet alone, where significant reductions in HbA(1c) from baseline of 0.9% and 0.95% were seen at 10 and 24 months. Similarly, a sustained effect of gliclazide MR was observed in a subgroup of elderly patients defined a priori; HbA(1c) was decreased to a similar degree to that observed in the general study population. Gliclazide MR showed similar tolerability to gliclazide IR after 10 months' treatment in the randomised trial. The most commonly observed adverse events were arthralgia, arthritis, back pain and bronchitis (each <5%). Bodyweight remained stable. In this study no episodes of nocturnal hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemia requiring third party assistance were observed during treatment with gliclazide MR. Episodes of symptomatic hypoglycaemia were infrequent, occurring in approximately 5% of patients.

Nateglinide and mitiglinide are immediate short-acting insulinotropic agents. Both are administered preprandially to control postprandial hyperglycemia. Glinide drugs are characterized by immediate onset as well as rapid disappearance of effect as compared with sulfonylurea drugs. We examined the rapidity of onset of the therapeutic effect between nateglinide and mitiglinide by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis using the receptor-binding-dissociation model in rats. Nateglinide or mitiglinide was administered orally or intravenously to rats and blood samples were collected at various time-points post administration. The plasma concentrations of the unbound drug forms and the blood glucose were measured. When the simultaneous fitting of oral administration and intravenous administration was performed using the receptor-binding-dissociation model, the measured values exhibited good correspondence with the fitting curve. Moreover, the time-courses of changes of the receptor-binding rate (sulfonylurea receptor) were examined using the parameters (k (on): second-order binding association constant to the receptor, Φ: receptor-binding occupancy ratio) obtained from the analysis. The results showed that the binding rate, which is important for glinide drugs in the early phase after administration, was obviously higher for nateglinide than that for mitiglinide from 10 min after oral administration and between 0 and 30 min after intravenous administration. These results suggest a more rapid onset of the therapeutic effect of nateglinide than that of mitiglinide after the drug is distributed into the blood.

The selection of appropriate pharmacologic therapy for any disease requires a careful assessment of benefit and risk. In the case of type 2 diabetes, this decision typically balances the benefits accrued from improved glycemic control with the risks inherent in glucose-lowering medications. This review is intended to assist therapeutic decision-making by carefully assessing the potential benefit from improved metabolic control relative to the potential risks of a wide array of currently prescribed glucose-lowering agents. Wherever possible, risks and benefits have been expressed in terms of absolute rates (events per 1000 patient-years) to facilitate cross-study comparisons. The review incorporates data from new studies (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial), as well as safety issues associated with newer glucose-lowering medications.

We designed a single unit type tablet formulation containing nateglinide to decrease both postprandial blood glucose level (PBG) and fasting blood glucose level (FBG) in normal beagle dogs. The tablet was a dry coated tablet comprising both a core tablet (an erosion matrix tablet: a controlled release portion(nateglinide: 90 mg)) and an outer shell (an immediate release portion (nateglinide: 60 mg)). The weight, the diameter and the hardness of the obtained tablet were 416.1 mg, 10 mmpsi, about 60 N, respectively. The dissolution study of the obtained tablet in pH 1.2 or 6.8 showed that the nateglinide in the immediate release portion dissolved in almost 30 min., and that 30 min after the dissolution test started, the nateglinide in the controlled release portion had dissolved slowly. An in vivo single oral administration study using normal beagle dogs showed the bioavailability value of the obtained nateglinide dry coated tablets against nateglinide immediate release tablets was 73.6%, although the value of nateglinide controlled release tablets containing enteric coated granules was 57.2-60.8%. An in vivo multiple oral administration study (b.i.d.(interval: 12 h), 8 d) using normal beagle dogs showed the reproducibility of nateglinide absorption. In addition, decreases in both PBG and FBG were observed. The ability to decrease the blood glucose level did not weaken during a multiple administration. On the basis of the above results, a controlled release formulation containing a short-acting type oral blood glucose regulator, not only nateglinide but meglitinides (repaglinide, mitiglinide, etc.) was suggested to enable control of both PBG and FBG for moderate and severe diabetes patients.

Sergliflozin etabonate, a novel oral selective low-affinity sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitor, improves hyperglycemia by suppressing renal glucose reabsorption, in which SGLT2 participates as a dominant transporter. In the present study, we examined the antidiabetic profile of sergliflozin etabonate in a diabetic model, KK-A(y) mice, with symptoms of obesity and hyperinsulinemia. The blood glucose level was monitored in non-fasted female KK-A(y) mice after a single oral administration of sergliflozin etabonate. The non-fasting blood glucose level was reduced in a dose-dependent manner after a single oral administration of sergliflozin etabonate (39% reduction at 2 h after a dose of 30 mg/kg). The effects of long-term administration of sergliflozin etabonate on the blood glucose level were assessed in female KK-A(y) mice in several studies (4-day, 8-week, and 9-week administration study), in which sergliflozin etabonate was administered in the diet. The non-fasting blood glucose and plasma insulin were both lowered dose-dependently in the 4-day administration study. Long-term treatment with sergliflozin etabonate dose-dependently improved the hyperglycemia and prevented body weight gain in the 8-week study. In addition to the improvement in glycemic control, fatty liver and pancreatic beta-cell abnormalities were ameliorated in mice fed sergliflozin etabonate in the 9-week study. These data indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors could be useful to improve hyperglycemia resulting from insulin resistance without pancreatic beta-cell abuse or body weight gain. SGLT2 inhibitors may simultaneously realize both a systemic negative energy balance and correction of hyperglycemia.

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy.(ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.) Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

The objective of this research was to develop microsphere-based once-daily modified release tablet formulations of diltiazem hydrochloride (DH), a potent calcium channel blocker used in angina pectoris. For this purpose, DH-loaded microspheres were prepared by the solvent evaporation technique using Eudragit RS 100. The effect of variation in the drug/polymer ratio on the physical and release characteristics of the microspheres was investigated. After the selection of the suitable microspheres, tablets were compressed using Compritol 888 ATO, Ludipress and Cellactose 80 as different direct tableting agents and excipients. As a result, modified release tablet formulations of DH-loaded microspheres were designed successfully for oral administration once rather than two or three times a day in angina pectoris.

INTRODUCTION Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated)'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed. METHODS Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis. RESULTS The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI. CONCLUSION The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.

Several factors influence diabetes control, and many of these can adversely affect endeavors to obtain optimal glycemic management. For many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the passage of time often results in a loss of responsiveness to medication and a greater difficulty in achieving desired target levels. Although these observations in part reflect a natural progression of diabetes, irrespective of treatment given, it is possible to identify modifiable hurdles that can be addressed with better outcome results. Lifestyle measures, particularly diet and exercise, remain paramount, whereas other secondary confounding factors such as systemic or endocrine disease or other conflicting medication need specific therapeutic attention. Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will require oral hypoglycemic medication and this should be prescribed in the simplest, most effective, and safest way. Ensuring that patients fully understand treatment objectives is important resulting in better compliance with advised treatment. Such compliance can be significantly improved by keeping treatment regimens simple. With its novel once-daily formulation, gliclazide modified release has been shown to improve adherence to medication and result in better glycemic outcome as determined by improved HbA(1c) levels. Its benefits in terms of reduced risk of hypoglycemia have been demonstrated in the GlUcose control In type 2 diabetes: Diamicron modified release versus glimEpiride study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Gliclazide-modified release (gliclazide MR) is a new formulation of the sulfonylurea gliclazide designed for once-daily administration. The hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose-based polymer in the new formulation induces a progressive drug release, which parallels the 24-h glycaemic profile in type 2 diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of gliclazide MR (once-daily administration) versus gliclazide (twice-daily administration) in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-three type 2 diabetic Chinese patients who had been on diet control alone or on treatment with metformin or on low dose of sulfonylurea were randomized to either gliclazide MR taken once daily or gliclazide taken twice daily. Dosage of metformin was maintained throughout the study, and the sulfonylurea was stopped. The dose of gliclazide MR was increased at 1-month intervals from 30 mg to 120 mg, while that of gliclazide from 80 mg to 320 mg until metabolic control was achieved [fasting plasma glucose (FPG)< or = 7.7 mmol/l] or the maximum dose reached. Efficacy was mainly evaluated by levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and FPG. RESULTS The mean baseline characteristics of the full analysis set 1 (FAS1)(HbA1c, n = 58) and the FAS2 (FPG, n = 61) were comparable in both groups. The levels of HbA1c decreased similarly in both groups over the treatment period:-1.6 +/- 1.6%(p < 0.001) on gliclazide MR (n = 31) and -1.6 +/- 1.4%(p < 0.001) on gliclazide (n = 27). Decrease in HbA1c was observed irrespective of pre-existing therapy for diabetes:-2.3 +/- 1.5% for patients on diet alone;-0.6 +/- 1.3% for patients switched from sulfonylurea to study drug and -1.4 +/- 0.8% for patients on metformin in combination with study drug. FPG decreased significantly from 177.5 +/- 63.5 to 136.7 +/- 42.2 (p < 0.001, n = 32) on gliclazide MR and not significant from 188.2 +/- 62.6 to 163.7 +/- 67.9 (p = 0.059, n = 29) on gliclazide. Both treatments were very well tolerated with no major hypoglycaemic episodes requiring external assistance; only three patients experienced mild hypoglycaemic episodes. CONCLUSIONS Once-daily gliclazide MR showed a better trend in improving blood glucose control in comparison with gliclazide in type 2 diabetic Chinese patients irrespective of the pre-existing anti-diabetic treatment. The safety profiles of gliclazide MR and gliclazide were similar with a small number of patients having reported hypoglycaemic episodes. Once-daily dosing with gliclazide MR should improve patient compliance, an important factor in long-term glycaemic control.

The aim of this work is to verify the efficiency of two kinds of matrix tablets formulations containing PEO or PVA as retarding polymer. Moreover, since in the last years the exposure to ionizing radiation is a more and more used method to reduce bacterial charge in pharmaceutical products, the effects of gamma irradiation on these two kinds of polymers has been evaluated. The study is performed on matrix tablets containing diltiazem HCl, as model drug, and polyethylene oxides (PEO) of two different molecular weights or polyvinylalchool (PVA) of medium degree of hydrolysis, as drug release modulators. Dissolution of the matrices, release of diltiazem and morphological behaviour of the samples, before and after exposure to increasing doses of gamma irradiation, are investigated in order to verify their stability.The results show that the ionizing radiation does not modify significantly the dissolution trend of the PVA samples; on the contrary, the dissolution and the morphological behaviour of the PEO matrices is strongly affected by the radiation dose received. In particular, the dissolution rate of the irradiated PEO tablets dramatically increases as a function of the irradiation dose and the swelling process, which characterised the non-irradiated PEO samples, was replaced by a rapid erosion process responsible for the quickly dissolution of the matrices. The changes of the dissolution and morphological PEO tablets performances could be explained by a breaking of the polymeric chains (shown by EPR studies) as a consequence of the exposure to gamma rays. These chemical-structural modifications of the polymers are responsible for the reduced efficacy of the PEO systems in controlling the drug release rate.