BACKGROUND: Parents feel strongly about whether or not to learn the sex of their fetus. We sought to determine which factors are significantly associated with parents' desire to know or not to know the fetal sex during a prenatal ultrasound. METHODS: All women undergoing prenatal ultrasound examinations, except for those with suspected failed pregnancies, were invited to answer a questionnaire at an outpatient referral center for diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology in Boston, Massachusetts. The survey asked about demographic factors, current pregnancy, and past pregnancies, and an open-ended question about whether and why the parents wished to learn, or did not learn, the sex of their fetus. Factors significantly associated with parents' desire to learn the fetal sex prenatally were determined and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,340 questionnaires were completed. Overall, 761/1,302 (58%) of mothers and 747/1,295 (58%) of fathers learned or planned to learn the fetal sex before delivery. Factors most associated with wanting to learn the fetal sex were conceiving accidentally, finding out the sex in a previous pregnancy, not planning to breastfeed, influence of sex on future childbearing plans, planning a move or renovation dependent on sex, and specific parental sex preference. Demographic factors most associated with wanting to learn the fetal sex were father without full-time job, lower household income, unwed mother, maternal age less than 22 or greater than 40 years, no college degree, race other than white, and religion other than Catholic. CONCLUSIONS: Specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics predicted whether or not parents chose to know the sex of their unborn child. Families in which the pregnancy was unplanned, those in which fetal sex would influence living arrangements or future childbearing plans, and those of lower socioeconomic status wished to know the sex more frequently. Further study is needed to understand parents' motivations underlying the desire to know or not know fetal sex before delivery.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is associated with an increased rate of fever in prospective randomized trials. While the evidence suggests that epidural fever is not infectious, epidural analgesia has been associated with increased rates of antibiotic use, the indications that prompt treatment have not been examined. METHODS: We analyzed 1235 nulliparous women with singleton term pregnancies presenting in labor with a temperature of < 99.5 degrees F. Antibiotic use during labor was categorized by indication. RESULTS: A total of 59.6% of women received epidural analgesia. The rate of antibiotic use was significantly higher in women receiving epidural analgesia (28 vs 10.8%). After adjusting for confounders using logistic regression, epidural analgesia was associated with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% CI 2.0, 3.4) for antibiotic treatment. The majority of the increased risk was due to significantly higher rates of antibiotic treatment for presumed chorioamnionitis (9.0 vs 0.4%) in the epidural analgesia group. CONCLUSION: Epidural-related fever results in excess maternal antibiotic treatment for presumed chorioamnionitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the "real-world" compliance with risk- and culture-based strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive term pregnancies delivered at three institutions (a subset of practices at an academic hospital using the culture-based strategy, an academic hospital using the risk-based strategy, and a community hospital using both) between January and March 1998. We abstracted demographic data and risk factors for group B streptococcus, group B streptococcal culture information, documentation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and adverse drug reactions. We compared intrapartum compliance with the intended strategy. RESULTS: There were a total of 505 women managed with the risk-based strategy. Of those, 79 had a risk factor for group B streptococcal disease and 72/79 (91.1%) received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. There were a total of 428 women managed with the culture-based strategy. Of those, 70 had positive cultures and 67 (95.7%) received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. An additional 39 women in the culture-based group had no documentation that cultures had been done. Of those, eight (20.5%) had risk factors and all eight received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Compliance with the risk-based strategy was 91.1 versus 96.2% with the culture-based strategy (p=0.3). Among women managed using the risk-based strategy, 5/426 (1.2%) received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis without an identifiable risk factor. Among women in the culture-based strategy, 5/359 (1.4%) received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis with documented negative group B streptococcal cultures (p=0.5). When examined by site, compliance with the intended strategy was 91.2% at the academic hospital using the risk-based strategy, 100% at the academic hospital using the culture-based strategy, 90.9% at the community practices using the risk-based strategy, and 82.4% at the community practices using the culture-based strategy. CONCLUSION: Overall, intrapartum compliance with the risk-based approach was similar to the culture-based approach. However, there were more cultures not done and cultures done at inappropriate gestations at the community hospital practice.

BACKGROUND: Trial of labor after cesarean section has been an important strategy for lowering the rate of cesarean delivery in the United States, but concerns regarding its safety remain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of newborns delivered by elective repeat cesarean section compared to delivery following a trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: All low-risk mothers with 1 or 2 previous cesareans and no prior vaginal deliveries, who delivered at our institution from December 1994 through July 1995, were identified. Neonatal outcomes were compared between 136 women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section and 313 women who delivered after a trial of labor. To investigate reasons for differences in outcome between these groups, neonatal outcomes within the trial of labor group were then compared between those mothers who had received epidural analgesia (n = 230) and those who did not (n = 83). RESULTS: Infants delivered after a trial of labor had increased rates of sepsis evaluation (23.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.008); antibiotic treatment (11.5% vs 4.4%, p = 0.02); intubation to evaluate for the presence of meconium below the cords (11.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001); and mild bruising (8.0% vs 1.5%, p = 0.008). Within the trial of labor group, infants of mothers who received epidural analgesia were more likely to have received diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions including sepsis evaluation (29.6% vs 6.0%, p = 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (13.9% vs 4.8%, p = 0.03) than within the no-epidural analgesia group. CONCLUSIONS: Infants born to mothers after a trial of labor are twice as likely to undergo diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions than infants born after an elective repeat cesarean section, but the increase occurred only in the subgroup of infants whose mothers received epidural analgesia for pain relief during labor. The higher rate of intervention could relate to the well-documented increase in intrapartum fever that occurs with epidural use.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean with postpartum fever after the prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a nested, case-control study in a cohort of all women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean over a 12-year period in a single tertiary care institution. The current study was limited to all women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean at term with a symptomatic uterine rupture and who also had their prior cesarean at the same institution. Four controls, who all had their prior cesarean at the same institution, were matched to each case by year of delivery, number of prior cesareans, prior vaginal delivery, and induction in the index pregnancy. Medical records were reviewed for maximum postpartum temperature for the previous cesarean. Fever was defined as a temperature above 38C. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed taking into account potential confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 21 cases of uterine rupture included in the analysis. The rate of fever following the prior cesarean was 38%(8/21) among the cases, and 15%(13/84) in the controls, P =.03. Multiple logistic regression analysis examining the association of uterine rupture and postpartum fever adjusting for confounders revealed an odds ratio of 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 15.5. CONCLUSION: Postpartum fever after cesarean delivery is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether maternal age is associated with a symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery over a 12-year period. We analyzed the labors of women with one prior cesarean and no prior vaginal deliveries. The uterine rupture rate was determined with respect to maternal age. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Overall, 32 (1.1%) uterine ruptures occurred among 3015 women. For women younger than 30 years, the risk of uterine rupture was 0.5%, and for those women aged at least 30 years, the risk of uterine rupture was 1.4%(P =.02). Controlling for birth weight, induction, augmentation, and interdelivery interval, the odds ratio for symptomatic uterine rupture for women aged at least 30 years compared with those less than 30 years was 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2, 8.4). CONCLUSION: Women aged 30 years or older have a greater risk of uterine rupture as compared with women younger than 30 years.

Wide disparities in obstetric outcomes exist between women of different race/ethnicities. The prevalence of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, fetal demise, maternal mortality, and inadequate receipt of prenatal care all vary by maternal race/ethnicity. These disparities have their roots in maternal health behaviors, genetics, the physical and social environments, and access to and quality of health care. Elimination of the health inequities because of sociocultural differences or access to or quality of health care will require a multidisciplinary approach. We aim to describe these obstetric disparities, with an eye toward potential etiologies, thereby improving our ability to target appropriate solutions.

We sought to examine racial/ethnic differences in deliveries by caesarean section (CS) over time, particularly among women at low risk for this procedure. To do so, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at the University of California, San Francisco, a tertiary care academic centre. Births occurring between 1980 and 2001 were included in the analyses. Women with multiple gestations, fetuses in other than the cephalic presentation or with other known contraindications to vaginal birth were excluded. A total of 28 493 African American, Asian, Latina and White women were studied. Risk-adjusted models were created to explore differences in CS risk by race/ethnicity. We also performed analyses of subgroups of women at relatively low risk of CS, and explored changes in observed disparities over time. The overall CS rate was 15.8%. The absolute rate was highest among Latinas (16.7%) and lowest among Asians (14.7%). After adjustment for known risk factors, African American women had a 1.48 times greater odds of having a CS than did White women [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31, 1.68], and Latina women had a 1.19 times greater odds [95% CI 1.05, 1.34]. Stepwise adjustment for confounders showed that this variation is not entirely explained by known risk factors. These differences exist even for women at low risk of CS, and have persisted over time. We conclude that racial and ethnic disparities in CS delivery exist, even among women presumed to be at lower risk of CS; rates have not improved with time. Disparities in risk-adjusted CS should be considered as a quality metric for obstetric care, whether at the national, state, hospital or provider level.

Many postmenopausal women live with diabetes mellitus; however, little information is available about how the changes that occur around the time of menopause might uniquely affect management of diabetes mellitus in this population. Although the weight gain that commonly occurs during the menopausal transition is largely attributable to aging rather than the transition itself, changes in body composition have been independently associated with menopausal status. These changes in body composition have, in turn, been associated with alterations in insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in postmenopausal women. Hormone therapy seems to have neutral or beneficial effects on the adverse changes in body composition associated with menopause. Whether menopausal status independently influences diabetes risk remains controversial. Nevertheless, consistent findings from large clinical trials suggest that postmenopausal hormone therapy decreases the risk of developing diabetes mellitus. Similarly, many studies suggest that postmenopausal hormone therapy has neutral or beneficial effects on glycemic control among women already diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus. Future studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms that underlie these relationships and to determine how these observations should influence recommendations for the care of postmenopausal women with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the motivation for motherhood in women with hypertensive diseases in pregnancy. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 2600 women with hypertensive diseases in pregnancy and 1233 controls. Diagnoses from medical records were differentiated according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy criteria. After matching, data from 739 patients and 623 controls were evaluated with Student's-t, Chi square tests and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Women with hypertensive diseases in pregnancy longed more often for children (85.3%/70.3%, p < 0.0001), considered children more often as the sense of their life (33.6%/29.7%, p < 0.005) and used pregnancy more often to stop a disliked professional activity (9.7%/2.3%, p < 0.0001). Controls reported more often to give birth to avoid termination of pregnancy (5.3%/10.4%, p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Women with hypertensive diseases in pregnancy concentrate more extensively on motherhood in their life. If this attitude is already present before pregnancy it may augment the risk for disease and might be used for prophylaxis.

A nurse-led telephone monitoring program shows promise.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate preeclampsia/eclampsia rates for Florida and identify risk factors for prolonged length of stay (PLOS) among women hospitalized throughout Florida for preeclampsia/eclampsia and discharged in 2001. DESIGN: Analyses were performed using a statewide hospital discharge dataset from Florida. Hospital discharge rates per Florida female population and risk per 100 deliveries were calculated for women hospitalized for preeclampsia. Binomial regression was used to calculate relative risks (RR) of PLOS among 5495 women. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for nesting by facility. RESULTS: Non-Whites had higher preeclampsia discharge rates per 10,000 population than Whites in every age group. The overall risk of preeclampsia was 3.9 per 100 deliveries, with the highest risks in the youngest and oldest age groups. The strongest risk factor for PLOS was having a diagnosis of preeclampsia/eclampsia superimposed on pre-existing hypertension. These patients had 2.64 times the risk of PLOS than patients who had mild or unspecified preeclampsia (P value <.0001). Diabetics were also at a higher risk of PLOS (adjusted RR=1.26, P=.003). Women who were admitted from the emergency department were 26% less likely than women admitted from other sources to have PLOS (adjusted RR=.74, P=.01). For every 10-year increase in maternal age, there was a 23% increase in the risk of PLOS (adjusted RR=1.23, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Advancing maternal age, Black race, diabetes, severe preeclampsia, and preeclampsia (or eclampsia) superimposed on existing hypertension increased the risk of PLOS, while being admitted from the emergency department was associated with a decreased risk of PLOS.