ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Anemia is one of the most common medical complications to be encountered in critically ill patients. Based on the results of clinical trials, transfusion practices across the world have generally become more restrictive. However, because reduced oxygen delivery contributes to "secondary" cerebral injury, anemia may not be as well tolerated among neurocritical care patients. METHODS: The first portion of this paper is a narrative review of the physiological implications of anemia, hemodilution and transfusion in the setting of brain-injury and stroke. The second portion is a systematic review to identify studies assessing the association between anemia or the use of red blood cell transfusions and relevant clinical outcomes in various neurocritical care populations. RESULTS: There have been no randomized controlled trials which have adequately assessed optimal transfusion thresholds specifically among brain-injured patients. The importance of ischemia and the implications of anemia are not necessarily the same for all neurocritical care conditions. Nevertheless, there exists an extensive body of experimental work, as well as human observational and physiological studies, which have advanced knowledge in this area and provide some guidance to clinicians. Lower hemoglobin concentrations are consistently associated with worse physiological parameters and clinical outcomes; however, this relationship may not be altered by more aggressive use of red blood cell transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Although hemoglobin concentrations as low as 7 g/dl are well tolerated by most critically ill patients, such a severe degree of anemia could be harmful in brain-injured patients. Randomized controlled trials of different transfusion thresholds, specifically in neurocritical care settings, are required. The impact of the duration of blood storage on the neurological implications of transfusion also requires further investigation.

We sought to determine the effect of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes in elderly patients with closed head injury. We retrospectively reviewed elderly closed head injury patients (> or = 65 years) comparing 52 patients on warfarin (AC) with 439 patients not on warfarin (NAC) with subsequent 1:3 propensity matching used to analyze comparable groups. The overall AC group had a higher head abbreviated injury score (AIS)(4.0 +/- 0.7 vs 3.8 +/- 0.7, P = 0.04) compared with the NAC group. After propensity matching, 49 AC patients were compared with 147 NAC patients who were similar for age, gender, injury severity score, and head AIS. Admission INR was higher in the AC group compared to the NAC group (2.5 +/- 1.3 vs 1.1 +/- 0.3, P < 0.0001) and the AC group had a higher mortality rate (38.8% AC (19/49) vs 23.1% NAC (34/147), P = 0.04). In the AC group, survivors and nonsurvivors had similar repeat International Normalized Ratio (INR) values (1.57 +/- 0.65 survivors vs 1.8 +/- 0.72 nonsurvivors, P = 0.31). The AC group experienced greater morbidity after trauma and had higher mortality rates than their NAC counterparts. Prevention of injury and more selective use of warfarin in this patient population are essential to decrease mortality.

We evaluated the benefit of a central venous line (CVL) protocol on bloodstream infections (BSIs) and outcome in a trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population. We prospectively compared three groups: Group 1 (January 2003 to June 2004) preprotocol; Group 2 (July 2004 to June 2005) after the start of the protocol that included minimizing CVL use and strict universal precautions; and Group 3 (July 2005 to December 2006) after the addition of a line supply cart and nursing checklist. There were 1622 trauma patients admitted to the trauma ICU during the study period of whom 542 had a CVL. Group 3 had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) compared with both Groups 2 and 1 (28.3 +/- 13.0 vs 23.5 +/- 11.7 vs 22.8 +/- 12.0, P = 0.0002) but had a lower BSI rate/1000 line days (Group 1: 16.5; Group 2: 15.0; Group 3: 7.7). Adjusting for ISS group, three had shorter ICU length of stay (LOS) compared with Group 1 (12.11 +/- 1.46 vs 18.16 +/- 1.51, P = 0.01). Logistic regression showed ISS (P = 0.04; OR, 1.025; CI, 1.001-1.050) and a lack of CVL protocol (P = 0.01; OR, 0.31; CI, 0.13-0.76) to be independent predictors of BSI. CVL protocols decrease both BSI and LOS in trauma patients. Strict enforcement by a nurse preserves the integrity of the protocol.

The objective of this study was to determine if clinical examination accurately ruled out pelvic fractures in intoxicated patients sustaining blunt trauma A prospective comparison of intoxicated (blood alcohol level [BAL] greater than 0.08 g/dL) to nonintoxicated (BAL less than 0.08 g/dL) patients sustaining blunt trauma was performed between February 2004 and March 2007. Clinical factors were compared and subset analysis performed in which patients with factors known to compromise the clinical examination were excluded. Two hundred ninety-six intoxicated patients were compared with 1071 nonintoxicated patients. Intoxicated patients were younger and more often male. Intoxicated patients had a higher heart rate (97.1 beats/min +/- 17.9 vs 91.4 beats/min +/- 18.7, P < 0.0001) and lower systolic blood pressure (136.2 mmHg +/- 21.2 vs 141.9 mmHg +/- 26.6, P = 0.0005) than nonintoxicated patients. Intoxicated patients had a lower incidence of pelvic fracture (6.1 vs 10.6%). In subset analysis, the majority of the intoxicated patients did not have exclusion factors on examination and could be evaluated (66.6%). There were eight pelvic fractures diagnosed in this group and no missed injuries on clinical examination (sensitivity 100%). Clinical examination was not compromised by intoxication. Routine pelvic x-rays are not needed in the alert, intoxicated patient sustaining blunt trauma.

We prospectively compared clinical examination (CE) with plain films (PXR) and both tools with CT in patients sustaining blunt trauma. There were 1388 patients who had both PXR and CT of whom 168 (12.1%) were diagnosed with a fracture by CT. CE findings most predictive of fracture included age (OR, 1.025; CI, 1.011-1.039), hip pain (OR, 4.971; CI, 2.508-9.854), internal rotation of the leg (OR, 4.880; CI, 1.980-12.027), or tenderness to palpation over the sacrum (OR, 2.297; CI, 1.144-4.612), over the right or left hip (OR, 3.626; CI, 1.823-7.214), or diffusely throughout the pelvis (OR, 16.445; CI, 4.277-63.237). These factors were still predictive of pelvic fractures even in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13. There were 136 fractures identified by PXR all of which were identified by CE (sensitivity 100%[136 of 136], negative predictive value 100%[619 of 619]). There were six patients with negative clinical examinations and positive CTs (sensitivity 96.4%[162 of 168], negative predictive value 99.03%[613 of 619]), none of which were hemodynamically significant. The sensitivity for PXR compared with CT was 79.17 per cent (133 of 168) and the NPV was 97.2 per cent (1217 of 1252). CE is a reliable way to diagnose pelvic fractures and PXR is a poor screening tool for these injuries compared with CT. Because the majority of patients undergo CT after blunt trauma, routine screening radiographs should be eliminated.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of a lateral cervical spine plain film in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated blunt trauma patients from February 2004 to September 2006 who had both a lateral cervical spine (LCS) film and a computed tomography of the cervical spine (CTC), comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LCS to the CTC. RESULTS: There were 1004 patients who met inclusion criteria. Eighty-four patients had a cervical spine fracture while 920 patients had no fracture on CTC. Of the 84 patients with fractures by CTC, 68 had a negative or incomplete LCS. Of the 920 negative CTC, there were 7 false positive LCSs. LCS compared with CTC showed a sensitivity of 19%(16/84) and positive predictive value of 69.6%(16/23). Of the 981 negative or incomplete LCS films, 96.9% were incomplete (951/981). Of the seven patients with a false positive LCS (negative CTC), none was subsequently found to have a cervical spine fracture on further evaluation. Elimination of the LCS would result in charge savings of $265,056.00 (LCS charges with interpretation,$264 each) and increase patient safety by eliminating error. CONCLUSIONS: LCS has no value as a screening tool in the blunt trauma patient since most are either inaccurate or incomplete. It should be eliminated from the Advanced Trauma Life Support algorithm, and CTC should receive emphasis as the diagnostic gold standard.

BACKGROUND:: Blood glucose (BG) at admission correlates with lactate and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this correlation continues at 24 hours. METHODS:: We studied 335 trauma patients correlating Injury Severity Score (ISS), lactate, and outcome parameters to BG at admission and 24 hours. RESULTS:: There were 134 patients at admission and 68 patients at 24 hours who had a high blood glucose (HBG)(>150 mg/dL). Admission HBG group had higher ISS (25.3 +/- 13.6 vs. 19.8 +/- 11.4, p = 0.0002, analysis of covariance p < 0.0001), longer lengths of stays (in days)(ventilator: 2.0 +/- 4.4 high blood sugar [HBS] vs. 0.8 +/- 2.5 low blood sugar [LBS], p = 0.0034; intensive care unit: 7.7 +/- 10.1 HBS vs. 4.6 +/- 7.5 LBS, p = 0.0001; hospital: 14.7 +/- 13.8 HBS vs. 9.8 +/- 11.6 LBS, p < 0.0001) and a higher mortality rate (15.67%[21 of 134] HBS vs. 7.46%[15 of 201] LBS, p = 0.02) compared with the LBS group. A significant linear relationship existed between ISS and blood sugar (r = 0.06, p < 0.0001) and ISS and lactate (r = 0.05, p < 0.0001). The Pearson correlation identified that blood sugar and lactate trended together (r = 0.3, p < 0.0001). Twenty-four-hour HBG failed to correlate with worse outcomes. With lactate </=2.2 mmol/L at 24 hours (n = 287), there was no difference in mortality between the HBG and LBG groups (9.8%[5 of 51] HBS vs. 6.36%[15 of 236] LBS, p = 0.37). In the LBG group at 24 hours (n = 267), there was a significant difference in mortality with a lactate >2.2 mmol/L group (35.5%[11 of 31] vs. 6.36%[15 of 236], p = 0.00003). Using logistic regression, only lactate at 24 hours (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.259-2.546) and ISS (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.15) were independently predictive of death. CONCLUSIONS:: BG levels at 24 hours do not correlate with outcome, particularly if the patient is adequately resuscitated with a normal lactate.

This study evaluates whether an initial blood glucose level is similarly predictive of injury severity and outcome as admission lactate in trauma patients. Between February 2004 and June 2005, we prospectively compared patients with presenting blood sugars of < or =150 mg/dL (LBS) with those with blood sugars >150 mg/dL (HBS). Fifty patients had BS above 150 mg/dL, whereas 176 patients were < or = 150 mg/dL. These groups had similar demographics except for age. Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > or = 15 was seen in 56.0 per cent of HBS patients versus 28.4 per cent of LBS patients (P = 0.0006). HBS patients had similar infection rates (12.0% HBS vs. 5.7% LBS, P = 0.13) but a higher mortality (30.0% HBS vs. 5.7% LBS, P < 0.0001). There was a linear relationship between ISS and BS (r2 = 0.18, P < 0.0001) and ISS and lactate (r2 = 0.17, P < 0.0001). Blood sugar trended with the lactate (r = 0.25, P = 0.0001). Hyperglycemic patients were more severely injured with higher mortality. BS correlated with lactate, and because it is easily obtainable, it may serve as a readily available predictor of injury severity and prognosis.

BACKGROUND:: Poor follow-up by patients with trauma results in a lack of knowledge of postdischarge health-related issues. This study reports on postdischarge health-related issues discovered by a program of active postdischarge contact or follow-up. METHODS:: All patients discharged home from the trauma service were followed up in the following manner: within 4 weeks of discharge, telephonic follow-up was attempted three times followed by scanning of electronic records. Failing that, other physicians (specialists or primary care) were contacted. Once contact was established, the patient, family member, or physician was questioned about the general well-being, any specific health-related issue, and the resolution. RESULTS:: During the 13-month study period ending September 2007, a total of 1,353 patients met entry criteria. Contact was established with 692 (51%). Of these, 116 (17%) were found to have significant health issues:(1) severe uncontrolled pain, 45;(2) missed injury, 17 (spine fractures, 4; clavicle or hand or foot fractures, 6; facial bone fractures, 3; soft tissue, 3; hematuria, 1);(3) wound infections, 17;(4) other infections, 17 (urinary, 8; pulmonary, 7; blood stream, 2)(5) venous thromboembolism, 10; and (6) other, 9 (psychiatric, 6; nontraumatic, 3). One patient died at home within 24 hours of discharge. The issues were significant enough for the patients to seek medical care (outpatient, 39; emergency department visits, 52; hospitalization, 24). CONCLUSION:: A significant proportion of patients with trauma have moderate to severe health-related issues postdischarge that are often not found by the trauma team or the trauma registry. Active follow-up can identify the nature of the medical issues and help in designing system changes to reduce or eliminate them.

We examined the outcome of elderly trauma patients with pelvic fractures. Patients 65 years of age and older (elderly) with pelvic fractures were retrospectively compared with patients younger than 65 years with pelvic fractures and also with elderly patients without fracture. Over the study period, 1223 patients sustained a pelvic fracture (younger than 65 years, n=1066, 87.2%; elderly, n=157, 12.8%). These patients were also compared with 1770 elderly patients with blunt trauma without fracture. Although the pelvic fracture patients were equally matched for Injury Severity Score (21.2 +/- 13.4 nonelderly vs. 20.5 +/- 13.6 elderly), hospital length of stay was increased in the elderly (12.5 +/- 13.1 days vs. 11.5 +/- 14.1 days) and they had a higher mortality rate (20.4%[32 of 157] vs. 8.3% 88 of 10661). The elderly without fracture also had a higher mortality rate when compared with the younger patients (10.9%[191 of 1760]; P < 0.03). The elderly were more likely to die from multisystem organ failure (25.0%[eight of 32] vs. 10.2%[nine of 88]), whereas the nonelderly group was more likely to die from exsanguination (45.5%[40 of 88] younger than 65 years vs. 21.9%[seven of 32] 65 years or older; P < 0.05). Elderly patients with pelvic fracture have worse outcomes than their younger counterparts despite aggressive management at a Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The advanced trauma life support course is not available or affordable to rural areas in low-income countries. A trauma continuing education course was created to educate physicians of rural hospitals in the jungles of Ecuador. METHODS: A basic trauma care course was designed based on local resources and location of injury, including rudimentary health posts in the jungle, rural hospitals, and definitive referral centers. Course effectiveness was evaluated by a comparison of test scores before and after the course. A multiple choice questionnaire was given. Comparison to previous test scores was also performed. Paired Student's t test was used for statistical analysis. An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), based on the course design, was administered. RESULTS: Twenty-six rural physicians participated in the course. Mean test scores significantly improved from pretest to post-test (72% to 79%; p = 0.032). Knowledge deficiencies in prehospital care, extremity injury care, and patient evaluation adjuncts significantly improved from 23% to 87%, 23% to 100%, and 31% to 100%, respectively. Test results after the course showed improvements in all major categories tested. Twelve of the 26 participants were repeat test takers from a course provided 2 years earlier. These participants showed improved pretest scores compared with their highest previous test score (76.8% versus 68.5%; p = 0.0496). Compared with first-time test takers, these participants showed improved pretest (76.8% versus 68.4%) as well as post-test (81% versus 76%) scores. Twenty-five of the 26 physicians participated in the OSCE, with a pass rate of 76%. The OSCE identified various strengths and deficiencies based on patient location and available resources. In rudimentary health posts, management was adequate for hemorrhage control (65%), immobilization (77%), and early transfer to rural hospitals (92%). Prehospital communication was inadequate (53%). Rural hospital management was adequate for primary evaluation (60%) and resuscitation (74%) but poor in secondary patient evaluation (53%), adjuncts (25%), and transfer to definitive referral centers (11%). OSCE scores differed from multiple choice questionnaire test results. DISCUSSION: Where there is no advanced trauma life support, a tailored trauma course and evaluation can be effective in educating local providers. A well-designed competency evaluation (multiple choice questionnaire and OSCE) is helpful in identifying deficient local aspects of trauma care. The course design and evaluation methods may serve as a model for continuing trauma care education in developing countries.

Blood transfusion has been associated with infection; however, the collinearity of injury severity has not been clearly addressed to show a direct relationship. Using more rigorous analysis, we aimed to untangle the effect of injury severity from transfusion leading to sepsis. We hypothesized that blood transfusion independently increases infection in massively transfused versus nontransfused patients with matched Injury Severity Scores (ISSs). We performed a matched cohort study measuring infection rates in trauma patients receiving massive transfusion. Control subjects were contemporaneous patients with matched ISS receiving no blood. Infection was defined as intraperitoneal or intrathoracic abscesses, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or bacteremia. Multivariate logistic and univariate analysis was completed. Infection rate was 61 per cent in 44 transfused patients versus 20 per cent in 44 control subjects (P = 0.001). Odds of infection were eightfold greater in transfused patients (OR, 7.97; 95% CI, 2.3 to 27.5; P < 0.001) independent of ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism, and age. Infection was most associated with transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), although transfusion of other blood products had strong collinearity with PRBCs. Transfused patients had eight times the risk of infection independent of ISS; this appears to be the result of PRBC transfusion. Modifying the ratio of components in transfusion protocols favoring plasma may cause less infection after injury.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is a common therapy for multiple trauma patients, and is often performed soon after hospital admission. It is unclear whether the need for a blood transfusion in multiply injured patients presenting with a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, since their risk behavior differs significantly from patients with a negative BAC. In this study, we evaluated the role of blood transfusion in the treatment of BAC-positive multiple trauma patients. Patients In a three-year period, 164 patients at a single trauma center presented with a positive BAC, and 145 met the inclusion criteria for further evaluation and regression analysis. We compared patients who were transfused (n=76) with those who were not transfused (n=69). RESULTS: In both groups, the most common causes of trauma were traffic accidents and falls. Most patients were admitted to the hospital from the scene of the accident (77.2%) and were male (89.0%). Transfused patients had a lower GCS (p [less than or equal to].001) and higher ISS (p [less than or equal to].001), were more likely to have severe head injuries (p [less than or equal to].001), tended to have higher BACs (p =.053), had lower hemoglobin levels and prothrombin times in the first 24 hours (p [less than or equal to].001), had lower lactate levels, had higher rates of intubation (p [less than or equal to].001) and ICU admission, and had longer ICU stays and artificial ventilation times (p [less than or equal to].001). Mortality was significantly higher in transfused patients (n=15 vs. n=3, p [less than or equal to].001). Non-survivors were more likely to have severe head injuries; be intubated and ventilated; be older; have higher ISS scores, lactate levels, and numbers of transfusions in the first 24 hours; and have lower GCS scores, hemoglobin measurements, and prothrombin levels. In a binary logistic regression model, only age (p =.009) and ISS (p =.004) independently predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center study, the BAC of multiple trauma patients and the number of blood transfusions they received did not predict mortality in multiple trauma patients if used as independent predictors. Prospective studies with greater sample sizes should be performed to clarify the role of blood transfusions in the outcome of this sub-population.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors affecting mortality and morbidity in thoracoabdominal injuries were evaluated. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty patients (227 males, 23 females; mean age 30.1+/-5.11; range 15 to 71 years) who had been exposed to thoracoabdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy between June 1996 and November 2005 were investigated retrospectively. Patients were assessed according to age, sex, trauma-operation interval, shock, hospitalization period, number of injured organs, blood transfusion, timing of closed thorax drainage, thoracotomy, Abdominal Trauma Index, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, Revised Trauma Score, and complications. RESULTS: Mortality and morbidity ratios were 15.6% and 53.5%, respectively. The factors effective on mortality were trauma-operation interval >or=3 hours (p=0.03), presence of shock (p=0.03), increase in the rate of blood transfusion (p=0.001), injured organ number >or=3 (p=0.001), and not performing early-term closed thorax drainage (p=0.005). Trauma-operation interval <3 (p=0.02), increase in the rate of blood transfusion (p=0.02), injured organ number >or=3 (p=0.001), and not performing early-term closed thorax drainage (p=0.005) were the factors effective on morbidity. CONCLUSION: It was determined that trauma-operation period >or=3 hours, number of injured organs >or=3, and increased number of blood transfusions increased both mortality and morbidity. However, presence of shock increased only mortality. On the other hand, application of closed thorax drainage within a reasonable time period was determined to decrease mortality and morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effects of anemia in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this study was to examine the role of anemia and blood transfusion on outcomes in TBI patients. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of all blunt trauma patients with TBI admitted to the ICU from July 1998 to December 2005. Admission and daily ICU blood hemoglobin (hemoglobin) levels and blood transfusions during the first week of hospitalization were measured. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin<9 g/dL occurring on 3 consecutive blood draws. The role of anemia and blood transfusion was investigated using logistic regression adjusting for factors, with p<0.2 from the bivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,150 TBI patients were admitted to the ICU. When both anemia and blood transfusion were included in the full model, blood transfusion was significantly associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.27, 3.75]; p=0.0044) and more complications (AOR, 3.67 [95% CI, 2.18, 6.17]; p<0.0001), but anemia was not. But when transfusion was not included in the full model, anemia was a significant risk factor for mortality (AOR, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.13, 2.24); p=0.007) and for complications (AOR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.42, 2.70]; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion is associated with significantly worse outcomes in traumatic brain injured patients. In addition, blood transfusion is a major contributing factor to worse outcomes in TBI patients who are anemic. We caution against the liberal use of blood in TBI patients.