We performed a retrospective audit of cross-laboratory testing of desmopressin and factor concentrate therapy to assess the potential utility of supplementary testing using the PFA-100 with functional von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity testing. Data were evaluated for a large number of patients with von Willebrand disease of type 1, type 2A or type 2M, as well as a comparative subset of individuals with haemophilia or carriers of haemophilia. Laboratory testing comprised pre and postdesmopressin, or pre and postconcentrate, evaluation of factor VIII, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity as traditionally performed, supplemented with collagen-binding (VWF:CB) testing and PFA-100 closure times. In brief, both therapies tended to normalize VWF test parameters and closure times in individuals with type 1 von Willebrand disease, with the level of correction in closure times related to the level of normalization of VWF, particularly the VWF:CB. However, although occasional correction of closure times was observed in patients with type 2A or type 2M von Willebrand disease, these did not in general normalize PFA-100 closure times either with desmopressin or factor concentrate therapy. In these patients, improvement in closure times was more likely in those in whom VWF:CB values normalized or when VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios normalized. This study confirms that there is a strong relationship between the presenting levels of plasma VWF and PFA-100 closure times, and that the supplementary combination of PFA-100 and VWF:CB testing might provide added clinical utility to current broadly applied testing strategies limited primarily to VWF:Ag, VWF ristocetin cofactor and factor VIII:coagulant. Future prospective investigations are warranted to validate these relationships and to investigate their therapeutic implications.

Plasma-derived factor concentrates are important in the management of von Willebrand disorder (VWD). In our geographic locality, a single viral inactivation step concentrate (AHF [High Purity]), has been replaced with one using a double viral inactivation step (Biostate((R))). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) after administration of AHF (High Purity) and Biostate((R)). This study was a single-blind, randomised cross-over, multi-centre investigation in twelve people with VWD, comprising four type 3, two type 2B, one type 2M and five type 1 VWD. The subjects received a single infusion of 60 IU/kg ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) of either AHF (High Purity) or Biostate((R)), and after a minimum 15-day wash-out period they received the alternative product. Blood samples were collected for up to 48 hours after each dose for assay of FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) and VWF by VWF:RCo, collagen binding capacity (VWF:CB) and antigen (VWF:Ag). As a measure of delivered VWF 'functionality' we calculated the area-under-the-concentration-time-curve (AUC) ratios of VWF:RCo to VWF:Ag and VWF:CB to VWF:Ag. The effect on platelet adhesiveness by PFA-100 closure times (CTs) was measured prior to and 30 minutes post infusion. VWF multimers were also assessed pre and post infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters after AHF (High Purity) and Biostate((R)) were in close agreement for VWF:RCo (confirming dosing equivalence). Parameters for other study markers were also similar, although Biostate((R)) tended to yield relatively lower VWF:Ag and higher VWF:CB levels. Although AHF (High Purity) and Biostate((R)) resulted in similar levels of high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers post-infusion, the relative level of HMW to low-molecular-weight (LMW) multimers were determined to be higher following Biostate((R)). The relative levels of functional VWF (i.e. VWF:CB and VWF:RCo) to VWF:Ag were also higher in Biostate((R)) compared to AHF (High Purity). With both study products, PFA-100 CTs 30 minutes post infusion showed minor improvement for only some subjects. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of FVIII:C and VWF are not significantly different after administration of AHF (High Purity) and Biostate((R)). Study parameters considered as 'in-vitro' markers of VWF 'functionality' or potential clinical efficacy (i.e. VWF:CB and VWF:RCo relative to VWF:Ag, level of HMW VWF relative to LMW-VWF) were determined to be higher for Biostate((R)) than AHF (High Purity). PFA-100 CTs did not adequately reflect changes in these VWF parameters. Based on these results, one would expect Biostate((R)) to be at least as effective, if not superior to AHF (High Purity) for the treatment of VWD.

Regular multilaboratory surveys of laboratories primarily in Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia have been conducted over the past 8 years to evaluate testing proficiency in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder (VWD). We have reassessed the findings of these surveys with a particular emphasis on the diagnostic errors and error rates associated with particular tests or test panel limitations. The 37 plasma samples dispatched to survey participants include 9 normal samples, 4 type 1 VWD samples, 8 type 2 VWD samples (2A x 3, 2B x 3, 2M x 1, and 2N x 1), and 4 type 3 VWD samples. In addition to providing numerical test results, participant laboratories (average, n = 35) were asked to provide diagnostic interpretations of their test results regarding whether VWD was evident and, if so, the probable subtype. Although laboratories usually provided correct interpretative responses, diagnostic errors occurred in a substantial number of cases. On average, type 1 VWD plasma was misidentified as type 2 VWD plasma in 11% of cases, and laboratories that performed the ristocetin cofactor assay for von Willebrand factor (VWF:RCo) without performing the collagen-binding activity assay for VWF (VWF:CB) were 6 times more likely to make such an error than those that did perform the VWF:CB. Similarly, type 2 VWD plasma samples were misidentified as type 1 or type 3 VWD in an average of 20% of cases, and laboratories that performed the VWF:RCo without the VWF:CB were 3 times more likely to make such an error than those that performed the VWF:CB. Finally, normal plasma was misidentified as VWD plasma in an average of 5% of cases, and laboratories that performed the VWF:RCo without the VWF:CB were 10 times more likely to make such an error than those that performed the VWF:CB. We conclude that laboratories are generally proficient in their testing for VWD and that diagnostic error rates are substantially reduced when test panels are more comprehensive and include the VWF:CB.

Although short activated partial thromboplastin times (APTTs) are generally considered to be laboratory artefacts of problematic blood collections, there is mounting evidence that in some cases a short APTT may reflect a hypercoagulable state, potentially associated with increased thrombotic risk and adverse cardiovascular events. We prospectively evaluated the phenomenon of short APTTs in 113 consecutive samples compared with an equal number of age and sex-matched normal APTT samples. We found a significant difference in various test parameters including prothrombin time (PT), Factor (F) V, FVIII, FXI, FXII, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen and collagen-binding activity, and in the level of procoagulant phospholipids, as assessed using a novel assay procedure (XACT). Interestingly, there was a significant negative association for fibrinogen, and although elevated, there was no significant association for FIX. On the basis of identified consecutive samples having multiple low APTTs on several sequential days, a proportion of laboratory-defined short APTTs appear to represent in-vivo hypercoagulability. In conclusion, plasma from patients presenting with short APTTs is reflective of a complex hypercoagulant milieu that could feasibly contribute to thrombotic risk, and 20% or more of laboratory definable short APTTs appear to reflect in-vivo phenomenon.

Pregnancy and delivery are critical times for women with bleeding disorders, with mothers, and possibly their affected infants, being exposed to a variety of haemostatic challenges. Management of women with bleeding disorders during pregnancy involves a multidisciplinary team including, but not limited to, an obstetrician, an anaesthetist and a haematologist. This consensus document from the Australian Haemophilia Centre Directors' Organisation (AHCDO) provides practical information for clinicians managing women with bleeding disorders during pregnancy. Included are: the expected physiological response in pregnancy in such women; management of pregnancy, labour and delivery, as well as obstetric anaesthesia issues, postpartum care, and reducing and treating postpartum haemorrhage; and management of infants at risk of a bleeding disorder and of bleeding in neonates. The guidelines were developed after extensive consultation, face-to-face meetings and revisions. The final document represents a consensus opinion of all AHCDO members. Where evidence is lacking, recommendations are based on clinical experience and consensus opinion.

Abstract In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no "one size fits all", guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms "laboratory instrument selection" and "laboratory instrument evaluation". Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46.

Platelet activation occurs in a variety of clinical situations in which it directly contributes to the pathology. This study reports a simple flow cytometric assay for platelet activation which measures platelet-derived microparticles, activated platelets and platelet-monocyte complexes. Pre- and post analytical conditions were investigated and optimized and a normal range established on 20 healthy controls. Twenty patients pre- and post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were tested with the technique. Soluble activation markers sCD40 ligand and sP-selectin and plasma phospholipid levels were measured in both groups. There was a significant increase in activated platelets and platelet-monocyte complexes between normal and pre-PCI (P = 0.005 and 0.0275, respectively) suggesting an activated state. There was a significant fall in activated platelets post-PCI (P = 0.0027) which was mirrored by a fall in soluble CD40 ligand, soluble P-selectin and plasma phospholipid levels (P = 0.0066,<0.0001 and 0.0032, respectively) consistent with antiplatelet therapy administered during the process. This is a reliable and rapid method for the assessment of ex vivo platelet activation which may be an aid in diagnosis and help guide therapy for patients with thrombotic disease.

A prothrombotic and hemorrhagic state can separately manifest in one patient and can potentially cause several diagnostic problems. We report an intriguing case as an example of a potential hemostasis-based diagnostic dilemma. A 29-year-old female patient presented with a personal history of menorrhagia and other mucosal bleeding and renal ovarian thrombosis. Previous investigations had uncovered several diagnostic anomalies, including von Willebrand disease (VWD), factor V Leiden (FVL), antiphospholipid syndrome, and thrombocytopaenia. Previous therapy in this patient included heparin and warfarin for the thrombosis and desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) and antifibrinolytic therapy for surgical management. Subsequent laboratory testing with fresh samples consistently confirmed an equivocal (borderline normal/abnormal) level of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and FVL with activated protein C resistance (APCR). A patient sample, differentially labeled according to the tests being performed, was later distributed for blind testing to participants within several modules of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program (QAP). Most participants reported a low level of VWF consistent with possible mild Type 1 VWD, and most (but not all) reported a positive finding for APCR. All participants correctly reported the sample as heterozygous for the FVL mutation, negative for the Prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, and heterozygous for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation C677T. Interestingly, a significant number of laboratories performing Protein S testing using clot-based procedures also identified a false Protein S deficiency. In conclusion, this exercise showed how, either depending on the clinical review and specific laboratory investigation and tests performed, a pro-bleeding diagnosis (of either VWD or thrombocytopenia) or pro-thrombophilia risk (Antiphospholipid Syndrome or FVL/APCR or false Protein S deficiency) could potentially and differentially arise in the one patient.

We review the association between disorders of endocrine function and hemostasis. The content of more than 570 review articles were appraised to provide the core of 81 key articles referenced in this chapter. The search method used MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases and the key words e NDOCRINE DYSFUNCTION, DIABETES, GRAVES' DISEASE, HYPOTHYROIDISM, HYPERTHYROIDISM, THYROTOXICOSIS, VON WILLEBRAND DISEASE, VON WILLEBRAND FACTOR, BLEEDING DISORDERS, PLATELETS DYSFUNCTION, HEMOSTASIS DYSFUNCTION, and REVIEW. Abnormalities of hemostasis, platelets, and endothelium and the presence of microparticles, abnormal expression of adhesion molecules, and elevated von Willebrand factor are all associated with cardiovascular disease and are also features of various endocrine disorders, including diabetes and its complications, insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, and various thyroid disorders. Related causes and associated factors, including obesity, alcohol, hyperlipidemia, omega fatty acids, vitamin D, serotonin, insulin-like growth factors, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and C-reactive protein, are also discussed in this review.

Summary. The efficacy of highly purified VWF/FVIII concentrates with standardized ristocetin cofactor content (VWF:RCo) has been already proven in patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD). Aim of this retrospective study is to confirm efficacy and safety of two highly purified, doubly virus-inactivated VWF/FVIII concentrates in a large cohort of patients with VWD who were characterized at enrolment by bleeding severity score. Study drugs Alphanate or Fanhdi were given to 120 cases (51 males, 69 females, median age 50 years, range 6-83 years). Patients had VWD3 (10), VWD2A (19), VWD2B (25), VWD2M (10) and DDAVP-unresponsive VWD1 (56) and a median bleeding severity score of 8 (range 0-27). A total of 114 bleeding episodes in 55 cases and 131 surgical procedures in 85 cases could be analysed. Excellent-good clinical responses were seen in 97% of bleeding episodes and in 99% of surgical procedures. To prevent recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, cerebral (CNS) haemorrhage, haemarthroses, urogenital or multisite bleeding in more severe patients, secondary prophylaxis was also carried out in 15 cases with VWD3 (3), VWD2A (3), VWD2B (2), VWD1 (7). A median dose of 42 IU VWF:RCo kg(-1) given every other day or twice a week over a median period of 334 days (range 24-799) prevented bleeding completely in 13 cases and reduced its incidence in the remaining two. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of the study concentrates, not only in the management of bleeding and surgery but also in secondary prophylaxis of severe VWD.

Therapy for von Willebrand disease (VWD) aims to restore the hemostatic function conferred by von Willebrand factor (VWF), which facilitates platelet adhesion and aggregation, and serves to increase potentially low coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma. In patients unresponsive to desmopressin (DDAVP), the preferred treatment is with plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates. Only a few of the available VWF/FVIII concentrates have been licensed for use in VWD based on prospective studies. The efficacy of VWF/FVIII concentrates depends on the content and quality of VWF and FVIII. Several studies have demonstrated the variability of the VWF contents, as well as the differences in the VWF multimer patterns (including the high molecular weight VWF multimers that are most effective in restoring hemostasis), among these concentrates. Treating physicians should be aware of these disparities and the potential clinical implications for patients with different VWD subtypes. Dosing has traditionally been calculated based on the FVIII content of the products, although dosing based on VWF functional activity [e.g., VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo)] addresses the primary protein deficiency in VWD patients. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of concentrates dosed according to VWF:RCo. Dosing is generally consistent across VWD subtypes, although patients with severe phenotypes or undergoing major procedures may require more infusions or longer treatment duration. Other considerations for the use of VWF-containing concentrates include laboratory monitoring of efficacy and safety issues such as thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis.

Summary. Factor VIII (FVIII) levels show a considerable variability in female carriers of haemophilia A. Presently, the reasons for this are poorly understood. The aim of the study was to elucidate the influence of genetic and non-genetic parameters on FVIII plasma levels in carriers (n = 42). Results were compared with age-matched healthy women without carriership of haemophilia A (n = 42). Each carrier was tested for the family-specific mutation, ABO blood group, FVIII level, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen and activity and C-reactive protein (CRP). FVIII levels were lower in carriers compared to non-carriers [74%(51-103) vs. 142%(109-169), P < 0.001]. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to VWF activity, prothrombin-time, hs-CRP, fibrinogen, body mass index (BMI), age and smoking status as well as the distribution of ABO blood groups. In non-carriers, FVIII was statistically significantly correlated with BMI, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), VWF antigen, hs-CRP and fibrinogen. In carriers, significant correlations between FVIII and APTT, VWF antigen and activity were found, whereas BMI, hs-CRP or fibrinogen did not correlate with FVIII. In non-carriers, the association of FVIII with ABO blood groups was statistically significant (P = 0.006), but not in carriers of haemophilia A (P = 0.234). The type of FVIII gene mutation did not influence FVIII levels. Carrier status is the major determinant of a carrier;s FVIII plasma level. Factors known to influence FVIII levels in the general population do not significantly affect FVIII activity in carriers, neither does the type of mutation influence FVIII levels.

Von Willebrand disease, the most common hereditary bleeding disorder, arises from quantitative or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The aim of the treatment is to correct the dual defect of hemostasis caused by the abnormal/reduced VWF and the concomitant deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII). The synthetic vasopressin analogue desmopressin is the mainstay of therapy in about 80% of patients, while nearly 20% are unresponsive and must be treated with FVIII/VWF concentrates. This latter therapeutic option will be focused in the review, with particular consideration to the management of surgery and invasive procedures in these patients.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and may affect as many as one in 100 women. The condition results from a deficiency, dysfunction, or absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In women, the most common symptom of VWD is menorrhagia. Of women with menorrhagia, 5-20% have been found to have previously undiagnosed VWD. Besides menorrhagia, women with VWD are more likely to experience other conditions that manifest with abnormal reproductive tract bleeding. The patient with a suspected bleeding disorder should be referred to a hemophilia treatment center or hematologist with expertise in bleeding disorders for definitive diagnosis. After diagnosis, the first choice of therapy for the management of menorrhagia in adolescents or adult females who do not desire child bearing is still hormonal contraceptives. Women who fail hormonal contraceptives, yet desire future child bearing, and women who desire pregnancy are candidates for hemostatic therapy, which is generally reserved for patients with VWF levels less than 50 international units/dL. During pregnancy, VWF levels rise, frequently obviating the need for hemostatic therapy at the time of delivery. Minor procedures can be managed with 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin, antifibrinolytic medication, or both, but major surgery or childbirth requires replacement with VWF and should be conducted in a center with available hematologists, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, and laboratory support experienced in the management of bleeding disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Objective of this study was to identify gene mutation involved in a patient with type 2A von Willebrand disease (vWD). The bleeding time, vWF:Ag, FVIII:C, RIPA and multimeric assay were used for phenotypic diagnosis. All of the 52 exons and the exon-intron boundaries of vWF gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing was carried out. The results indicated that the levels of vWF:Ag, FVIII:C and RIPA decreased in this patient, the vWF multimer with high and intermediate molecular weight was absent in plasma. The sequencing of genomic DNA revealed a C4738G (L1580V) missense mutation in the vWF gene from the patient. In conclusion, the C4738G (L1580V) missense mutation effecting the form of vWF multimer was responsible to molecular mechanism in this patient with vWD.